Hartford Provost's Statement

STATEMENT CONCERNING BISHOP RIGHTER'S TRIAL

Note: This statement appeared before the Court met at Christ Church for a preliminary hearing on December 8. Because of many protests that the diocese planned to host the trial, Rt. Rev. Clarence Coleridge, Bishop of Connecticut, informed the court that he was withdrawing his invitation that they hold the trial in Hartford. The Court revealed this concern late on December 8 and announced that their next session will be in the Diocese of Delaware.

Lutibelle/Louie
December 19, 1995


        BY THE VERY REV. RICHARD H. MANSFIELD, JR., PROVOST
                    CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL


It has been announced publicly in the news media that the Episcopal 
Church will be holding a heresy trial here at Christ Cathedral in 
February.  Bishop Coleridge first gave permission for this trial to take 
place in the diocese and then asked me about having it take place 
here at the Cathedral.  It is the Bishop's Cathedral and he is the 
Chairperson of the Chapter of the Cathedral and he could have 
decided on his own to give permission for the trial to take place here.  
I very much appreciate his seeking my concurrence on the matter 
before a decision was made I would like to briefly present some of the 
facts about this trial and explain my concurrence in having the trial 
take place here at Christ Church Cathedral.

The person on trial is Bishop Walter Righter, the retired Bishop of 
Iowa who is 71 years old and is now living in Alstead, New 
Hampshire.  A presentment has been brought against him by ten 
bishops and approved by 66 other bishops.  The total was more than 
the one quarter of the 297 bishops of the Episcopal Church required 
for the calling of a trial.  The presentment was brought against Bishop 
Righter for ordaining a homosexual, the Reverend Barry L. Stopfel, 
who is now rector of St.  George's Church in Maplewood, New Jersey.  
The official charge being brought against Bishop Righter is teaching a 
doctrine contrary to that held by this Church

I gave my assent to having the trial here at the Cathedral without a 
moment's hesitation.  First, this is a process of our Church, directed by 
the leadership of our Church under the Canon laws of the Church.  
The Cathedral is part of the Episcopal Church and will always make 
every effort to accommodate the larger Church or groups in our 
Church when they wish access to the Cathedral.  That is a very 
important part of our ministry as a Cathedral which is practiced 
constantly in our ministry of hospitality to the many groups in the 
Diocese and the National Church.  Christ Church Cathedral in 
Hartford has an enviable reputation as an important center of our 
Church both in the Diocese and nationally.  Second, the Cathedral is 
primarily noted for its openness.  It is open to all groups regardless of 
whether we agree or disagree with their opinions or political positions 
both inside and outside the Church as long as they are peaceful and 
respectful in their use of the Cathedral.  There have been many groups 
that have met here at the Cathedral, some who were turned down or 
rejected by other venues whose political or theological opinion have 
not always been supported by the leadership of this Cathedral.  
Nevertheless, they found the Cathedral, sometimes to their 
amazement, a place of hospitality where they were able to freely 
pursue their interests in meeting here.  We want to have this 
reputation of openness and inclusiveness because we believe that that 
inclusiveness approximates the basic character of the ministry of Our 
Lord Jesus Christ who we are here to serve.

I feel that having assented to the heresy trial taking place here at the 
Cathedral I need as Provost of the Cathedral to state my personal 
position which I believe will give further evidence of the openness of 
the Cathedral.

First of all, the Cathedral for many years has been a place of 
hospitality to the homophile community and will continue to be so.  
The local Chapter of Integrity, while it was still in existence met here 
for many years.  The XX Club, a large support group for transsexuals, 
continues after many years to meet here.   My colleague, the Rev. 
Canon Clinton Jones, has been a pioneer in counseling and caring for 
the homophile community and those involved in gender dysphoria.  
We have in the past had homosexual clergy on our staff and we have 
homosexuals who are part of our congregation.

I do not want Bishop Righter's trial taking place here to in any way 
send a message to anyone that the homophile community or those 
dealing with gender issues are not welcome here at the Cathedral.  
They will always be welcome as long as I am Provost.  I am deeply 
saddened by whatever pain or disillusionment about the Church that 
Bishop Righter's trial may cause them.

Secondly, I believe this trial should not be happening, I think it is 
outrageous that in this day and age the Church is involved in a heresy 
trial on any issue but especially this one.  The millions of dollars that 
will be spent and the energy of the leadership of the Church expended 
on this trial is a sinful waste and the antithesis to the proper 
stewardship of our resources given to us by God.  I too am 
disillusioned and embarrassed by the leadership of our church when 
76 members of our House of Bishops could cause this to happen.  The 
perpetrators of this action tried to pass a resolution of censure against 
Bishop Righter at the General Convention of the Church and failed. 
The delegates at that Convention also acknowledged that they could 
not agree on the morality of homosexual conduct particularly in 
committed monogamous relationships.  Pursuing this action against 
Bishop Righter after all that seems in my opinion to be spurious and 
petulant.

Aside from all the theological and scriptural proof texts and 
arguments that space does not allow, my own personal position is that 
the Church has always been wrong whenever it has said that a 
particular group of people should be eliminated from consideration 
for ordination.  It was wrong when it said it about people with 
disabilities, it was wrong when it said it about people of color, and it 
was wrong when it said it about women, and it will be wrong whenever 
they try to say it about homosexuals.  If someone is associated with a 
group and that group is not permitted by the Church to be considered 
for the possibility of ordination, I think that person would 
understandably question in their hearts whether they are really 
considered and accepted as full and equal members of the Church. 
The Church only has the right in my opinion to discern through its 
Diocesan Bishops in their Separate dioceses with their appointed 
advisors whether an individual is called to the particular ministry of a 
deacon or priest or whether they are called to carry out their ministry 
in Christ's name as a lay person.

Thirdly, if the present process of the Episcopal Church can allow for 
and require a trial such as this, then I believe that those processes and 
the Canon laws involved need to be changed by the General 
Convention of the Episcopal Church so that this cannot happen again. 
I certainly hope that Bishop Righter will be acquitted and exonerated 
so that issues involved can be put to rest.

Having stated my personal position on the issues involved in Bishop 
Righter's trial, I want to reiterate my ascent to having the trial take 
place here at the Cathedral.  I feel that Bishop Coleridge made it 
possible for me to say no, which I deeply appreciate.  I said yes 
because we, at the Cathedral, are the Church and because we are an 
open and inclusive Church that is proud of that tradition of 
inclusiveness and diversity.

The Church is fallible.  It has been, God knows, guilty of gross errors 
many times in its past.  The Cathedral is fallible, I am fallible.  But I 
hope the Church and all of us in it, will always experience the open 
hospitality of the Cathedral as we continue to struggle together in this 
place to know God's will for us in this world.  This ministry of 
openness and inclusiveness has been my vision and my mission ever 
since I have been Provost of this cathedral.  I believe the decision to 
permit the trial to take place here offers us an opportunity to make a 
bold statement about that ministry of openness.  An openness to all, 
sinners and saints alike.  We are all both of them living under the hope 
of God's mercy and grace.

I feel confident, because of past experience, that the parishioners of 
this Cathedral including those who strongly disagree with my personal 
positions on the issues involved will support me in my decision to 
permit the trial to take place at the Cathedral.  I rejoice and give 
thanks to God that I serve in a place where I can have that confidence 
and can expect that kind of support.


Send mail to: lcrew@andromeda.rutgers.edu