| Home Polity & Structure General Convention House of Deputies House of Bishops Provinces and dioceses of the Anglican Communion Resources Argumentation Data & Analysis Documents Reports & Events Tools & Services News flashes, Announcements Links Religious LGBT Christian General Links Poetry Reflections/Sermons Do Justice Joy Anyway Angels Unawares Louie Crew: Natter/BLOG parish (Grace/Newark) diocese (Newark) province (II) TEC assignments current calendar publications resume cv education software for writers Louie Crew 377 S. Harrison Street, 12D East Orange, NJ 07018 Phone: 973-395-1068 h lcrew@andromeda.rutgers.edu
Married February 2, 1974 12/21/1974
9/23/2009 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index] Re: [HoB/D] Walking in the Minefield
> B033, however binding, has no enforcement mechanism attached to it. That's one of B033's worst features: In passing it, my colleagues refused to take responsibility for the discrimination they established. B033 underwrites caprice. It specifically urges others to do its dirty work: search committees, electors, and those who exercise the power of consent. They work behind closed doors. It is impossible to hold them accountable for they interpret "whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider communion." Everyone knows that in context of our life in the Anglican Communion "those whose manner of life...." targeted most immediately lesbians and gays, but the resolution backed off from that candor and specificity to protect those who discriminate as B033 urges them to do. If those who voted for B033 had named lesbians and gays as the specific target for the discrimination, they would have openly violated the canons of this church. (See the relevant canons at http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~lcrew/docs.html#canons). B033 lets them sneak when violating those canons. B033 manipulates episcopal elections with an economic strong arm worthy of the Mafia: Suppose one discerns that the person most qualified of all the nominees is lesbian or gay. Is it responsible to vote for someone whose election might force the diocese to have to start another election from scratch if not enough consent? What diocese is in a financial position to risk substantial jeopardy to ongoing diocesan ministry for another year or more? As co-chair of our Search Committee for an election during this triennium, I experienced B033 as an ungodly violation of the Holy Spirit, an attempt of my colleagues at General Convention to tell the Holy Spirit to shut up regarding lbgt candidates. Bishops active now were consecrated at an average age of 49.7. Very few are consecrated when older than 56. B033 virtually closed down access of the church to the most talented lbgts currently in that age range. How long do you want intend to underwrite this discrimination? Louie, L1 Newark
My site has been accessed Statistics courtesy of
WebCounter.
|