| Home Anglican pages poetry software for writers Natter/BLOG Queer Eye for the Lectionary current calendar publications resume cv education Louie Crew 377 S. Harrison Street, 12D East Orange, NJ 07018 Phone: 973-395-1068 h lcrew@andromeda.rutgers.edu Links Religious LGBT Christian General Links
Married February 2, 1974 12/21/1974
9/23/2009 |
Louie Crew's Natter [BLOG][Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index] Re: Punitive Actions against TEC
> Punitive action was taken against the Episcopal Church for its election of > Gene Robinson to the episcopacy. We were required to sit out one meeting > of the Anglican Consultative Council Wrong. The ACC and/or the primates asked TEC to sit out ACC, but it did not, nor by ACC polity could it, require that action. Executive Council called a special meeting (rare indeed) to respond to the request, and voted voluntarily to give up TEC's seat and voice. Kim Byham and I were among the minority who voted against the resolution. Before the vote, EC had a straw vote that revealed we were fairly equally divided between: stay away as asked; go and exercise our rights as a member of the ACC; or go to be present at the meeting and speak with any one who sought to speak to us outside the meeting, but sit as guests without voice or vote in the meeting. With that kind of division in Council, few were surprised that they went for the third option. They were wrong, and once our people went to Nottingham, few talked with them and that did not have much access to those with seat, voice and vote. Furthermore, in our absence, the primate members saw they had enough votes to change rules to make them more powerful. It was not clear whether we were asked to stay away for just one meeting or for an indefinite time. We made our intention clear that TEC would practice this policy just for the one meeting, and indeed, TEC's three members did attend the most recent meeting of the ACC exercising fully seat, voice, and vote. > Then the Primates required our House of Bishops to promise no more > ordinations of gay bishops Wrong again. The Primates could not require any action of us: they have no jurisdiction over our House of Bishop, nor has our House of Bishops formally agreed to the Primates' request. Many believe our bishops would not consent to a gay person if elected, but that's speculation. Several lgbts have been nominated since 2003, but no out lgbt person has been elected since +Gene. If our bishops choose to do what the Primates asked, our bishops have to take responsibility for doing what the Primates have not jurisdiction to require. I am not trying to reduce the responsibility of Anglicans outside who are interfering in the decisions of TEC.. The primates often not only request, but threaten dire consequences if TEC does not do what the ask. But both Houses of GC must take responsibility for our own actions and not cowardly say, "the Anglican Communion made me do it." Louie Louie Crew, 377 S. Harrison St., 12D, East Orange, NJ 07018 973- 395-1068 http://queereye4lectionary.blogspot.com/ Queer Eye for the Lectionary
My site has been accessed Statistics courtesy of
WebCounter.
|