The purpose of this bibliography is to provide a list of performance
measurement and citizen participation resources for educators. In
addition, an
annotated list of references is also
provided on this site.
Allen, J. R. (1996). The uses of performance measurement. Government
Finance Review, 12(4), 11-16.
American Nurses Association. (1996). Nursing quality indicators:
Definitions and implications. Washington, D.C.: American Nurses
Association.
American Nurses Association. (1996). Nursing quality indicators:
Guide for implementation. Washington, D.C.: American Nurses
Association.
American Productivity and Quality
Center. (1994). The benchmarking management guide. Portland, OR:
Productivity Press.
Ammons, D. N. (1994). The role of professional associations in
establishing and promoting performance standards for local government.
Public Productivity and
Management Review, 17(3), 281-298.
Ammons, D. N. (1995). Overcoming the inadequacies of performance
measurement in local government: The case of libraries and leisure
services. Public Administration
Review, 55 (1),
37-47.
Ammons, D. N. (1995). Accountability for performance: Measurement and
monitoring in local government. Washington, DC: ICMA.
Ammons, D. N. (1996). Local government standards via professional
associations: How useful are they for gauging performance? In A.
Halachmi and G. Bouckaert (Eds.),
Organizational performance and
measurement in the public sector.
Westport, CT: Quorum.
Ammons, D. N. (1996). Municipal benchmarks: Assessing local
performance and establishing community standards. Thousands Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications.
Ammons, D. N. (2000). Benchmarking as a performance management tool:
Experiences among municipalities in North Carolina.
Journal
o f
Public Budgeting, Accounting and
Financial Management, 12(1), 106-124.
Ammons, D. N. (2000). Performance benchmarks in local government risk
management. Fairfax, VA: Public Entity Risk Institute.
Ammons, D. N., Coe, C., and Lombardo, M. (2001).
Performance comparison projects in local government: Participants'
perspective. Public
Administration Review, 61(1), 100-110.
Andersen, B. and Pettersen, P. (1996).
The benchmarking handbook:
Step-by-step instructions. London: Chapman & Hall.
Aristigueta, M. (1998). Managing
for results in state government. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books.
Arizona Governor's Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting. (1995).
Managing for results: Strategic planning and performance measurement
handbook. Arizona: Governor's Office for Excellence in Governing.
Asher, C. (1992). Polling and the public: What every citizen should
know. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Association of Oregon Counties. (1994). Governing for results: Using
benchmarks to define and measure progress toward strategic priorities. Oregon:
Association of Oregon Counties.
Auditor General of Canada. (1997).
Moving toward managing for results: Report of the auditor
general of Canada to the House of Commons.
Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and
Services.
Austin, City of, Texas (1999).
Citizens prioritizing city services: 1999 citizen survey results.
City of Austin, Texas.
Barrett, K. and Greene, R. (1994). The state of the cities: Managing for
results. Financial World,
163(3), 40-43.
Barrett, K. and Greene, R. (1994).
Managing for results: Phoenix. Financial World, 163(3), 47.
Barrett, K. and Greene, R. (1995).
State of the states 1995: Tick, tick, tick. Financial World,
164(20), 36-39.
Barrett, K. and Greene, R. (2000). Grading the cities: A management
report card. Governing,
13, 22-91.
Baugher, D (Ed.) (1981).
Measuring effectiveness. New directions for program evaluation
series, No. 11. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Behn, R. D. (1992). Bottom-line
government. Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy, the Governors
Center at Duke University.
Behn, R. D. (1997). Broken windows
and production targets. Governing. Available at:
http://www.governing.com/archive/1997/mar/manage.txt
Bens, C. K. (1986). Strategies for implementing performance
measurement. Management Information Service Report, 18: 1-14.
Washington, D.C.: ICMA.
Berry, M. and Ikerd, J. (1996). Outcome budgeting: Catawba County,
NC. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and
Performance.
Blanche-Kapplen, S. and Lissman, L. (1996). Development and use of
outcome information in government: Oregon adult and family services.
Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and Performance.
Blodgett, J. and Newfarmer, G. (1996). Performance measurement
(Arguably): The hottest topic in government today. Public Management,
78, 6.
Bouckaert, G. (1992). Public productivity in retrospective. In M. Holzer
(Ed.) Public productivity handbook (pp. 5- 46). New York: Marcel
Dekker.
Bowden, M. (1996). Development and use of outcome information in
government: Oregon Department of Transportation. Washington, DC:
ASPA's Center for Accountability and Performance.
Bowerman, M. (1995). Auditing
performance indicators: The role of the audit commission in the
citizen’s charter initiative. Financial Accountability &
Management, 11(2), 171.
Bowsher, C. (1993). Improving
government: Measuring performance and acting on proposals for change.
Testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on
Legislation and National Security, Committee on Government Operations.
Boxwell, R. J., Jr. (1994). Benchmarking for competitive advantage.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brassard, M. (1989). The memory jogger plus. Methuen: GOAL/ QPC.
Brizius, J. A. and Campbell, M.D.
(1991). Getting results: A guide for government accountability.
Washington, DC: Council of Governors' Policy Advisors.
Broom, C., Jackson, M., Vogelsang
Coombs, V. and Harris, J. (1998). Performance measurement:
Concepts and techniques.
Washington, DC.
Broom, C. A. and McGuire, L. A. (1995). Performance-based government
models: Building a track record. Public Budgeting and Finance
Journal. 15 (4), 3-17.
Bruder, K. A., Jr. and Gray, E. M. (1994).
Public sector benchmarking: A practical approach. Public Management,
76(9), S9.
Bryant, S. (1996). Development and use of outcome measures: Long
Beach Police Department, Long Beach, CA. Washington, DC: ASPAS'
Center for Accountability and Performance.
Cabrero-Mendoza, E. (2000).
Mexican local governance in transition: Fleeting change or
permanent transformation? American Review of Public Administration,
30(4), 374-388.
Camall, C. A. (1995). Managing change in organizations. (2nd ed.)
London: Prentice Hall.
Campbell, M. D. (1997). Outcome and performance measurement systems: An
overview. Alliance for Redesigning Government at. Available at:
http://www.alliance.napawash.org/ALLIANCE
/Picases.nsf/.
Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation. (1987). Effectiveness:
Reporting and auditing in the public sector. Ottawa: Canadian
Comprehensive Auditing Foundation.
Cannon, J. (1996). Utah tomorrow. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center
for Accountability and Performance.
Capezio, P. & Morehouse, D. (1995).
Taking the mystery out of TQM: A practical guide to Total Quality
Management. (2nd ed.) Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press.
Carter, R. K. (1983). The
accountable agency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Carter, K. (1994).
Performance budgets: Here by popular demand. State Legislatures,
December, 22-25.
Carter, K. (1996). Measuring
performance improves budgeting. National Conference of State
Legislatures LegisBrief, February, 4-7.
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. (1998). Youth risk behavior surveillance: United States,
1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 14.
Chan, A. (1994). Managing a
government like a business: The Sunnyvale system. Government Finance
Review, 10(2), 7-11.
Chelimsky, E. (1997). The coming transformations in evaluation. In E.
Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (Eds). Evaluation for the 21st century
(pp. 1-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cheurprakobkit, S. (2000).
Police-citizen contact and police performance. Journal of
Criminal Justice, 28(4), 325-336.
Cheurprakobkit, S. and Bartsch, R.
A. (2001). Police performance: A model for assessing citizens & rsquo
satisfaction and the importance of police attributes. Police
Quarterly, 4(4), 449-468.
Chief Finance Officers (CFO). (1998). Integrating performance
measurement into the budget process. FinanceNet.
Christenson, L. (1996). Integration of business plan, strategic plan,
customer service plan, unit self assessment and employee performance
appraisals: Washington State Department of Labor and Industry.
Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and Performance.
Claudle, S. L. (1987). Productivity politics: Gilding the farthing.
Public Productivity Review, 44, 39-51.
Coe, C. (1999). Local government benchmarking: Lessons from two major
multi-government efforts. Public Administration Review, 59(2),
110-115.
Coffey, J. (Ed.) (1993).
Resource manual for customer surveys. Washington, DC: Office of
Management and Budget.
Colwell, W. L., & Koletar, J. W. (1984). Performance measurement for
criminal justice: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) experience.
Public Productivity Review, 8(3), 207-224.
Communications and Coordination Directorate, Treasury Board of Canada,
Office of the Comptroller General, Evaluation and Audit Branch. (1992).
Your guide to measuring client satisfaction. Ottawa:
Communications and Coordination Directorate, Treasury Board of Canada,
Office of the Comptroller General, Evaluation and Audit Branch.
Cope, G. H. (1987). Local government budgeting and productivity: Friends
or foes? Public Productivity
Review, 10(3),
45-57.
Cope, G. H. (1992). Walking the fiscal tightrope: Local government
budgeting and fiscal stress.
International Journal of Public Administration, 15(5),
1097-1120.
Cothran, D. A. (1993). Entrepreneurial budgeting: An emerging reform?
Public Administration Review, 53(5), 445-454
Critchlow, D. (1985). The Brookings Institution, 1916-1952: Expertise
and the public interest in a democratic society. Dekalb, IL:
Northern Illinois University Press.
Croly, H. (1909). The promise of
American life. New York: Macmillan.
Curcio, C. F. (1996). Performance indicators: Phoenix Parks,
Recreation and Library Department. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for
Accountability and Performance.
Del'Agostino, B. (1995).
Observations about performance budgets from California. The Fiscal
Letter , 17(4), 4-5, 10-11.
Devlin, S. J., Dong, H.K. & Brown, M.
(1993). Selecting a scale for
measuring quality. Marketing Research, 5(3), 12-17.
Dillman. D. A. (1991). The design
and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology,
17(1), 225-249.
Dimock, M. E. (1936). Criteria and objectives of public administration.
In J. Gans, L. White, and M. Dimock (Eds.), The frontiers of public
administration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downs, G. W. and Larkey, P D.
(1986). The search for government efficiency: From hubris to
helplessness. New York:
McGraw-Hill Companies.
Drucker, P. F. (1975). Management: Tasks, responsibilities and
practices. New York: Harper & Row.
DuPont-Morales, M.A. and Harris, J.
E. (1994). Strengthening accountability: Incorporating strategic
planning and performance measurement into budgetings. Public
Productivity & Management Review, 17(3): 231-239.
Ehrenhalt, A.
(1994). Performance
budgeting: The name is... .Governing, 8(2): 9-10.
ElectriCities of North Carolina, Inc. (1997). 1997
Key Performance Indicators.
Raleigh, NC: ElectriCities of North Carolina, Inc.
Epstein, P. D. (1984).
Using performance measurement in local government: A guide to improving
decisions, performance and accountability. Council on Municipal
Performance Series. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company,
Inc.
Epstein, P. (1992). Measuring the performance of public service. In M.
Holzer (Ed.), Public productivity handbook (pp. 161-194). New
York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
Ferber, R., Sheatsley, P., Turner, A., and Waksberg, J.
(1981). What is a survey?
Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
Few, P. K. and Vogt, A. J. (1997). Measuring the performance of local
governments in North Carolina.
Government Finance Review, 13(4): 29-34.
Finch, J. C. (1995). Managing for results: Status of the Government
Performance and Results Act. Testimony before the Subcommittee on
Government Management, Information and Technology, US House of
Representatives. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Fischer, F. (1994). Organizational expertise and bureaucratic control:
Behavioral science as managerial ideology. In F. Fischer. and C.
Sirianni (Eds.), Critical studies in organization and bureaucracy
(pp. 174-195). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Fischer, F. (1986). Reforming bureaucratic theory: Toward a political
model. In D. J. Calista and S. S. Nagel (Eds.), Bureaucratic and
governmental reform (pp. 35-53). Jai Pr., Inc.
Fischer, R. J. (1994). An overview of performance measurement. Public
Management , 76(9): S2.
Fitzenz, J. (1993). Benchmarking
staff performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
The Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People
(1995). The annual progress report from the Florida Commission on
Government Accountability to the People. 1994-1995. Florida:
Executive Office of the Governor.
The Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People
(1995). Tracking the impact of state agencies on Florida's citizens:
An assessment of the Department of Corrections' Goal to Reduce
Recidivism. A report from the Florida Commission on Government
Accountability to the People. July. Florida: Executive Office
of the Governor.
The Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People
(1996). The Florida benchmarks report. February. Florida:
Executive Office of the Governor.
The Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People
(1997). Performance-based
program budgeting in context. Tallahassee, FL: Office of Program
Policy Analysis and Government Accountability.
Folz, D. H. (1996). Survey for
public administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fountain, J. (1995).
Establishing a system of managing for results. Olympia association of
government accountants spring symposium. Norwalk, CT: Governmental
Accounting Standards Board.
Fountain, J. (1997). Are state and local governments using performance
measures? PA Times, 20 (1): PM2, PM8.
Friedman, M. (1997). A guide to developing and using performance
measures in results-based budgeting. Washington, DC: The Finance
Project.
Fund for the City of New York, Center on Municipal Government
Performance. (1998). How smooth are
New York City's streets?
New York: Fund for the City of New York, Center on Municipal Government
Performance.
Gardner, J. (1994). American
renewal: Adding spirit to communities. Public Management, 76(9) :
8-12.
Gerber, B. (1990).
Benchmarking: Measuring yourself against the best. Training.
Minneapolis, MN: Lakewood Publications Inc.
Gianakis, G. (1996). Integrating performance measurement and budgeting.
In A. Halachmi and G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Organizational performance
and measurement in public sector: Toward service, effort and
accomplishment reporting. Westport: Quorum Books.
Glaser, M. A. (1999). Service delivery
satisfaction and willingness to pay taxes: Citizen recognition of local
government performance. Public Productivity & Management Review,
23(1): 48-67.
Glaser, M. A. (2000). Local government
performance through the eyes of citizens. Journal of Public
Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12(1): 49-73.
Glover, M. (1993). Performance
measurement: Local government efforts and successes. Paper
presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Conference on Public
Administration, Cocoa Beach, FL.
Goetz, A. M. and Jenkins, R. (2001). Hybrid
forms of accountability: Citizen engagement in institutions of
public-sector oversight in India. Public Management Review, 3(3):
362-363.
Goodsell, C. T. (1995). From
bureaucrat bashing to institution trashing. PA Times, 18 (2) :
11.
Gore, A. (1990). Service
efforts and accomplishments reporting: Its time has come - Sanitation
collection and disposal. Research report series. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
Gore, A. (1991). Service
efforts and
accomplishments reporting: Its time has come - Mass transit.
Research report series. Norwalk,
CT: GASB.
Gore, A. (1996).
Reinvention's next steps: Governing in a balanced budget world. A
Speech by Vice President Al Gore and Supporting Background Papers.
National Performance Review. Washington, D.C.
Gormley, W. T. and Weimer, D. A. (1999). Organizational report cards.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Governmental Accounting Standards
Board. (1992). Preliminary views of the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board on concepts related to service efforts and
accomplishments reporting.
Norwalk, CT: GASB.
Government Finance Officers Association. (1993). Distinguished budget
presentation awards program: Awards criteria. Chicago: Government
Finance Officers Association.
Government of Costa Rica & the World Bank. (1996). Guidelines for
drafting compromiso de resultados. San Jose, Costa Rica.
Greenberg, D. H. and Appenzeller, U. (1998). Cost analysis step by
step: A how to guide for planners and providers of welfare-to-work and
other employment and training programs. New York: Manpower
Demonstration Research Corporation.
Greenway, M. T. and Hatry, H. E. (1996). Focusing on program
outcomes: Summary guide. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
Greiner, J. M., Hatry, H. E., Koss,
M. E, Millar, A. E., & Woodward, J. P. (1981). Productivity and
motivation: A review
of state and local government
initiatives. Washington,
DC: Urban Institute Press.
Grifel, S. S. (1993). Performance measurement and
budgeting decision making. Public Productivity and Management Review,
16(4): 403-407.
Grifel, S. S. (1994). Organizational culture: Its importance in
performance measurement. Public Management, 76(9): S19.
Grizzle, G. A. (1987). Linking performance to funding decisions: What
is the budgeter's role? Public Productivity Review, 10(3):
33-44.
Halachmi, A. (Ed.) (1999). Performance and quality measurement in
government. Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
Halachmi, A. and Bouckaert, G. (Eds.) (1996).
Organizational
performance and measurement
in the public sector: Toward
service, effort and accomplishment reporting. Westport, Conn.:
Quorum Books.
Hardy, C. (1985). The management of
organizational closure. Aldershot: Gower.
Harrison, S. (1999). Propaganda, persuasion and symmetry: Local and
central government perspectives on communicating with the citizen.
British Journal of Management, 10(1): 53-62.
Harvey, E. and Mills, R. (1970). Patterns of organizational adaptation.
In M. Zald (Ed.), Power in organizations. Nashville, TN:
Vandervilt University Press.
Harvey, J. (1987). Measuring Productivity in Professional Services.
Public Productivity Review, 44: 29-38.
Hatry, H. P. (1978). The status of
productivity measurement in the public sector.
Public Administration Review,
38(1): 28-33.
Hatry, H. P. (1980). Local
government uses for performance measurement. Intergovernmental
personnel notes (pp.
13-15). Washington, DC:
Office of Personnel Management.
Hatry, H. P., Gerhart, C., and
Marshall, M. (1994). Eleven ways to make performance measurement more
useful to public managers. Public Management, 76(9): S15-S18.
Hatry, H. P., Mark F., Singer, T. O., and Liner, E. B.
(1990). A manual:
Monitoring the outcomes of economic development programs.
Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Hatry, H. P. (1986). Performance
measurement principles and techniques: An overview for local government.
Public Productivity
Review, 4: 312-339.
Hatry, H. P. (1993). How effective are your community services?
Conference Proceedings of the 1993 Managing for Results: Performance
Measures in Government. Austin, TA.
Hatry, H. P. (1999).
Performance measurement: Getting
results. Washington,
DC: The Urban Institute.
Hatry, H. P., Blair, L., Fisk, D., Greiner, J. M., Hall, J. R., Jr, and
Schaenman, P. S. (1992). How effective are your community services.
Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and ICMA.
Hatry, H. P., Fisk, D. M., and Winnie, R. W. (1981). Practical
program evaluation for state and local government. (2nd ed).
Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Hatry, H. P., Marcotte, J. E., Van
Houten, T., and Weiss, C. H. (1998). Customer surveys for agency
managers: What managers need to know. Washington, DC: Urban
Institute Press.
Hatry, H. P., Blair, L. H., Fisk, D.
H., Greiner, J. M., Hall, J. R., Jr., and Schaenman, P. S. (1977).
How effective are your community services? Procedures for monitoring the
effectiveness of municipal services. Washington, DC: The Urban
Institute and the International City Management Association.
Hatry, H. P., Blair, L., Fisk, D., and Kimmel, W. (1987). Program
analysis for state and local governments. (2nd ed). Washington, DC:
Urban Institute Press.
Hatry, P. and Fisk, D. (1992). Measuring productivity in the public
sector. In M. Holzer (Ed.), Public productivity handbook (pp.
139-160). NY: Marcel Dekker.
Hatry, H. P., Fountain, J. R., Jr., Sullivan, J. M., and Kremer, L.
(1990). Service efforts and accomplishments reporting: Its time has
come. Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
Hatry, H. E. and Kopczynski, M.
(1998). Guide to program outcome measurement for the U.S. Department
of Education.
Washington, DC: Urban Institute
Press.
Hatry, H. P, Fountain, J. R., Jr., and Sullivan, J. M. (1990). Overview.
In H. P Hatry, J. R., Fountain, J. M. Sullivan, and L. Kremer (Eds.),
Service efforts and
accomplishments reporting: Its time has come: An overview
(pp. 1-49). Norwalk, CT:
Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
Hatry, H. P., Van Houten, T., Plantz, M., and Greenway, M. T. (1996).
Measuring program outcomes: A practical approach. Alexandria, VA:
United Way of America.
Hauser, R. M., Brown, B. V., & Prosser, W. R. (Eds.). (1997).
Indicators of children's
well-being. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hawaii, State of. Auditor. (1994).
Sunset evaluation update: Nurses-A report to the governor and the
Legislature of the
State of Hawaii.
Honolulu, HA: Auditor of the State
of Hawaii.
Hayllar, M. P. (1999). Reforms to enhance accountability and citizen
involvement: A case study of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority.
International Journal of Public Administration, 22(3&4): 461.
Henry, G. T. and Dickey, K. C. (1993). Implementing performance
monitoring: A research and development approach. Public
Administration Review, 53(3): 203-212.
Ho, A. T.-K. and Coates, P. (2002). Citizen participation: Legitimizing
performance measurement as a decision tool. Government Finance
Review, 18(2): 8-10.
Holzer, M. (1992). Mastering public productivity improvement. In M.
Holzer (Ed.), Public productivity handbook. New York: Marcel
Dekker.
Holzer, M. and Halachmi, A. (1996). Measurement as a means of
accountability. International Journal of Public Administration,
19(11&12): 1921-1943.
Hosansky, D.
(1994). Tell Me Where The
Money Went. State Legislatures: 26-30.
Howard, R., and Schneider, L. (1994). Worker participation in
technological change: Interests, influence, and scope. In F. Fischer and
C. Sirianni (Eds.), Critical studies in organization and bureaucracy
(rev. edition) (pp. 519-544). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Ikerd, J. (1994). Case study:
Catawba County redesigns its budget system. Public Management,
76(9): S22.
Ingraham, P. W. and Romzek, B.
(1994). New paradigms for government: Issues for the changing
public service. Jossey-Bass Public Administration Series. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
The Innovation Group. Standard
Reporting of Performance Measures
International City/County Management Association. (1999).
Comparative performance measurement:
FY 1997 data report.
Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
International City Managers Association (1994). Comparative
Performance Measurement Consortium. Washington, DC: ICMA.
Iowa Department of Management
(1996). Technical and training handbook for budgeting for
results. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Management.
Jackson, M. (1996). Lessons learned from Minnesota's government
performance report. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability
and Performance.
Jaede, A. et al. (1996). Minnesota Milestones: 1996 progress report.
MN: Minnesota Planning. July.
Jonas, K. (1996). The Development of performance measures for
Virginia financial oversight. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for
Accountability and Performance.
Jones, A. (1997). Winston-Salem's participation in the North Carolina
performance measurement project.
Government Finance Review, 13(4): 35-36.
Joyce, P. G. (1993). Using performance measures for federal budgeting:
Proposals and prospects. Public Budgeting and Finance, 13(4):
3-17.
Justice Management Division, U.S. Department of Justice. (1995). DOJ
manager's handbook on developing useful performance indicators: Version
1.1, managing for results. Washington, DC: Author. April.
Kamensky, J. M. (1993). Program performance
measures: Designing a system to manage for results. Public
Productivity and Management Review, 16(4): 395-402.
Kamensky, J. M. (1995). Program performance measures: Designing a system
to manage for results. In A. Halachmi and M. Holzer (Eds.), Competent
government: Theory and practice: The best of public productivity and
management review, 1985-1993. (pp. 239-246). Burke, VA: Chatelaine
Press.
Karlof, B. and Ostblom, S. (1993).
Benchmarking: A signpost
to excellence in
quality and productivity.
New York: John Wiley.
Keehley, P. (1997).
Benchmarking for best practices in the public sector: Achieving
performance breakthroughs in federal, state, and local agencies.
Jossey-Bass Public Administration Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kelly, J. M. and Swindell, D.
(2002). Service quality variation across urban space: First Steps toward
a model of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Urban Affairs,
24(3): 271-288.
Kettl, D. F. (1993).
Toward new governance: Making process a priority. The La Follette Policy
Report. 5 (2). Madison, WI: La Follette Institute, University of
Wisconsin.
Kettner, P., Moroney, R. and Martin, L. (1990). Designing and
managing programs: An effectiveness based approach. Newbury Park:
Sage.
Knezo, G. J. (1995).
Government Performance and Results Act, P.L 103-62: Interim Status
Report. (revised). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research
Service.
Knight, K. E. (1967). A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation
process. Journal of Business, 40(4): 478-96.
Kopcynski, M. and Lombardo, M. (1999). Comparative performance
measurement: Insights and lessons learned from a consortium effort.
Public Administration Review, 59(2): 124-134.
Korman, N. and Glennerster, H. (1985). Closing a hospital: The
Derenth Park Project. Occasional Papers on Social Administration,
78. London: Bedford Square Press.
Kowalewski, R. (1996). Using
outcome information to redirect programs: A case of
the Coast Guard's pilot project
under the Government Performance and Results Act.
American Society for Public
Administration Case Study F3. Washington, DC: American Society for
Public Administration.
Kravchuck, R. and Schack, R. (1996). Designing effective performance
measurement systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of
1993. Public Administration Review, 56: 348-358.
LaPlante, A. (1994).
Sunnyvale: Performance-based budgeting. Computerworld, 28(40): 90.
Lappin, J., Figioni, P., and Sloan, S.
(1994). A primer on
consumer marketing research: Procedures, methods, and tools.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
Larkey, P. D. and Devereux, E. A. (1999). Good budgetary decision
process. In H. G. Frederickson and J. M. Johnston (Eds.), Public
management reform and innovation: Research, theory and application
(pp. 166-188). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Latsis, O. (1999). Citizens believe
in the government’s zeal. Current Digest of the Post Soviet
Press, 51(39): 17.
League of California Cities. (1994). A "how to" guide for assessing
effective service levels in California cities. Sacramento, CA:
League of California Cities.
Legislative Budget Board, Texas
Governor's Office of Budget and Planning. (1996). Detailed
instructions for preparing and submitting requests for legislative
appropriations for the biennium beginning September 1, 1997-Executive
and Administrative Agencies. Austin, TX: Legislative Budget Board,
Texas Governor's Office of Budget and Planning.
Legislative Budget Board, Texas
Governor's Office of Budget and Planning. (1998). Instructions for
preparing and submitting agency strategic plans: Fiscal Years 1999-2003.
Austin, TX: Legislative Budget Board, Texas Governor's Office of
Budget and Planning.
Legislative Budget Board, Texas
Governor's Office of Budget and Planning. (1998). Planning for "Texas
Tomorrow": Instructions for preparing and submitting agency strategic
plans for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Austin, TX: Legislative Budget
Board, Texas Governor's Office of Budget and Planning.
LeGrotte, R. B. (1987). Performance measurement in major U.S. cities.
Unpublished master's thesis. Denton, TX: North Texas State University.
Leibfried, K. and McNair, C. (1992). Benchmarking: A tool for
continuous improvement. New York: HarperCollins.
Leithe, J. L. (1997).
Implementing performance measurement in government: Illustrations and
resources. Chicago, Ill.: Government Finance Officers Association.
Municipal Research and Services
Center of Washington. (1994). Level of service standards: Measures
for maintaining the quality of community life. Kirkland, WA:
Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington.
Lewis, D. R., Johnson, D. S., Chen, T., and Erickson, R. N.
(1992). The use and reporting
of benefit-cost analyses by state vocational rehabilitation agencies.
Evaluation Review: A Journal of Applied Social Research, 16(3):
266-287.
Lichiello, P., Berkowitz, B.,
Thompson, J., Katz, A., and Perrin, E. B. (1998). Enabling
performance measurement
activities in the states and
communities. Seattle, WA:
Northwest Prevention Effectiveness Center and the Health Policy Analysis
Program.
Linden, R. (1993). Business
process reengineering: Newest fad or revolution in government? Public
Management, 75(11): 9.
Liner, E. B., Hatry, H. P., and Rossman, S. (1994). Measuring
progress of estuary programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Water: EPA 842-B-94-008 and 94-009.
Lipsey, M. W. (1993). Theory as method. In L. B. Sechrest and A. G.
Scott (Eds.), New directions for program evaluation, 57: 5-38.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Lipsey, M. W. (1998). Unsolved
mysteries and methodological quandaries. Paper prepared for the
Washington Evaluators Conference, George Washington University,
Washington, D.C.
Lynch, T. D. and Day, S. E. (1996). Public sector performance
measurement. Public Administration Quarterly, 19 (4): 404-419.
Ma, D. K.-L. (2000). Delivering
results on the ground: Improving service to citizens in Singapore.
Asian Journal of Political Science,
8(2): 137-144.
MacManus, S. A. (1984). Coping with retrenchment: Why local governments
need to restructure their budget document formats. Public Budgeting
and Finance, 4: 58-66.
Magura, S. and Moses, B. S. (1986).
Outcome measures of child welfare services: Theory and
applications. Washington, DC:
Child Welfare League of America, Inc.
Mann, S. (1986). Politics of public productivity. In M. Holzer and A.
Halachmi (Eds.), Strategic issues in public productivity: The best of
public productivity 1975-1985 (pp. 33-45). Burke, VA: Chatelaine
Press.
Mark, J. A.(1981). Measuring productivity in government-federal, state,
and local. Public Productivity Review, 5(1): 21-44.
Marshall, M. (1996). Development and use of outcome information in
government: Prince William County, Virginia. Washington, DC: ASPA's
Center for Accountability and Performance.
Marshall, M. (1999). 21st
century community focus: Better results by linking citizens, government,
and performance measurement. Public Management,
81(10): 12-18.
Marshall, M. (2000). 21st
century community governance: Better results by linking citizens,
government, and performance measurement. Quality Congress. ASQC…Annual
Quality Congress Proceedings,
pp.214-223.
Martin, D. W. (1992). The management classics and public productivity.
In M. Holzer (Ed.), Public productivity handbook (pp. 47-62). New
York: Marcel Dekker.
Martin, L. L. (1997). Outcome budgeting: A new entrepreneurial approach
to budgeting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial
Management, 9(1): 108-126.
Martin, L. L. and Kettner, P. M. (1996). Measuring the performance of
human service programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mayne, J. and Zapico-Gofi, E. (Eds.) (1997). Monitoring performance
in the public sector: Future directions from international experience.
New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
McGowan, R. P. (1986). Improving efficiency in public management: The
torment of sisyphus. In M. Holzer and A. Halachmi (Eds.), Strategic
issues in public productivity: The best of public productivity review,
1975-1985 (pp. 17-31). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
McGowan, R. P. and Poister, T. H. (1985). Impact of productivity
measurement systems on municipal performance. Policy Studies Review,
4 (3): 532-540.
McKevitt, D. and Lawton, A. (1996).
The manager, the citizen, the politician and performance measures.
Public Money & Management,
16(3): 49-54.
Mechanic, D. (1962). Sources of power of lower participants in complex
organizations. Administration Science Quarterly, 7(3): 349-364.
Mechlins, J. (1994). Governing guide: The route to reengineering
government. Governing, 7(5): 43-52.
Melkers, J. E. and Willoughby, K. G. (2001). Budgeters' views of state
performance- budgeting systems: Distinctions across branches. Public
Administration Review, 61(1): 54-64.
_______ (1998). The state of the states: Performance-based budgeting
requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review,
58(1): 66-73.
Merjanian, A. (1996). Strategic budgeting in Texas: A systems
approach to planning, budgeting, and performance measurement.
Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and Performance.
Michigan- American Association for Public Opinion Research (1991).
Code of professional ethics and practices. Ann Arbor, MI, iii.
Millar, A., Hatry, H. and Koss, M. (1977a). Monitoring the
outcomes of social services, Vol. I: Prelimnary suggestions.
Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
_______ (1977b). Monitoring the outcomes of social services, Vol.
II: Review of past research and test activities. Washington, DC: The
Urban Institute.
Miller, G. J. (2001). Introduction. In G. J. Miller, W. B. Hildreth,
and J. Rabin (Eds.), Performance-based budgeting. Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Millar, R. & Millar, A. (Eds.). (1981). Developing client outcome
monitoring systems: A guide for state and local social services agencies.
Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor. (1995). Best practices
review: Snow and ice control. MN: Minnesota Office of the
Legislative Auditor. May.
_______ (1994). Performance budgeting. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota
Office of the Legislative Auditor. February.
_______ (1995). Program evaluation division: State agency use of
customer satisfaction surveys [in Performance Reports]. MN:
Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor. October.
______ (1995). Development and use of the 1994 agency performance
reports. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor.
July.
Montjoy, R. S. and Brudney, J. L.
(1991). Volunteers in the delivery of public services:
Hidden costs. American Review of Public Administration, 21(4):
327-344.
Mumford, E. and Ward, T. (1966). Computers: Planning for people.
London: Batsford.
Mumford, E. and Ward, T. (1968). Computer technologists: Dilemmas of a
new role. Journal of Management Studies, 3: 244-255.
Mullen, E. J. and Jennifer, M. L. (Eds.). (1997). Outcomes
measurement in the human services. Washington, DC: National
Association of Social Workers.
Murphy, E. (2002). Best corporate citizens
have better financial performance. Strategic Finance, 83(7):
20-21.
National Academy of Public Administration. (1998). Effective
implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act: A study by
the panel on improving government performance. Washington, DC:
National Academy of Public Administration.
National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting. (1998).
Recommended budget practices: A framework for improved state and local
government budgeting. Chicago, IL: Government Finance Officers
Association.
National Civic League. (1999). The civic index: Measuring your
community's civic health (2nd ed.). Denver, CO: Author.
National Conference of State Legislatures (1994). The performance
budget revisited: A report on state budget reform. Legislative finance
report. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.
February.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1995). GPRA FY 1996
performance plan. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1996). Strategic
planning and performance measurement. Washington, DC: American
Society for Public Administration.
Naumann, E. and Kathleen, G. (1995). Customer satisfaction
measurement and management. Cincinnati, OH: Thomson Executive Press.
Newcomer, K. E. and Wright, R. F. (1997). Effective use of performance
measurement at the federal level. The PA Times, 20(1): 2- 4.
New York, City of., Office of Operations. Mayor's management report.
New York: Office of Operations, City of New York.
Norquist, J. O. (1998). The wealth of cities: Revitalizing the
centers of American life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Nyhan, R. C. and Marlowe, H. A., Jr.(1995). Performance measurement in
the public sector: Challenges and ppportunities. Public Productivity
& Management Review, 18(4): 333-348.
O'Connell, G. B. (1989). Rate your city: Here's how!. Public
Management, 71(6): 7-10.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (1998). Performance measures
of effectiveness: A system for assessing the performance of the National
Drug Control Strategy. (NCJ 168953). Washington, DC: Office of
National Drug Control Policy.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (1999). Performance measures
of effectiveness: Implementation and findings. (NCJ 174462).
Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy.
Olsen, R. T. and Epstein, J. (1997). Performance management: So what?
PA Times, 20(1): 1-7.
Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Fiscal Policy Analysis
Division. (1994). Choice's for Oregon's future: 1995-97. Salem,
OR: Budget and Legislative Proposal Instructions.
Oregon Department of Human Services. Adult and Family Services Division.
(1994). A brief history of the AFS performance measure system.
Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Human Services.
Oregon Progress Board. (1994). Oregon benchmarks and performance
measures. A report to the 1995. Legislature. December.
Oregon Progress Board. (1994). Oregon benchmarks: Standards for
measuring statewide progress and institutional performance. A report to
the 1995. Legislature. December.
Oregon Progress Board (1996a). Governing for results: Using
Benchmarks to define and measure progress toward strategic priorities.
Salem, OR: Author.
Oregon Progress Board (1996b). Oregon benchmarks-data directory.
Salem, OR: Author.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1997). In
search of results: Performance management practices. Paris:
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T (1992). Reinventing government: How the
entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading,
MA: Addison Wesley.
O'Toole, D. E. and Marshall, J. (1987). Budgeting practices in local
government: The state of the art. Government Finance Review,
3(5): 11-16.
O'Toole, D. E. and Stipak, B. (1988). Budgeting and productivity
revisited: The local government picture. Public Productivity Review,
12(1): 1-12.
Ottawa Office of the Comptroller General. (1992). Evaluation and
audit branch: Your guide to measuring client satisfaction. Ottawa:
Office of the Comptroller General. August.
Owen, B. and Maliovich, P. (1995). Understanding the value of ISO
9000: A management guide to higher quality, productivity, and sales.
Knoxvill, TN: SPC Press.
Pepinsky, H. E. (1989). Issues of citizen
involvement in policing. Crime & Delinquency, 35(3): 458-470.
Perrin, E. B. and Jeffrey J. K. (Eds.). (1997). Assessment of
performance measures for public health, substance abuse, and mental
health. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy
Press.
Perrow, C. (1972). Complex
organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.
Perry, J. L. (1989). Handbook of public administration. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Peters, T. J. and Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982). In search of
excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New
York: Harper & Row.
Petersen, J. E. (1994). Finance: Here's a city that's really being
reinvented. Governing, 75: 62.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of organizational
decision-making. London: Tavistock Publications.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 570.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). Examining change in the long term context of
culture and politics. In J. Pennings and Associates (Eds.),
Organizational strategy and change. New York: Jossey Bass.
Pettigrew, A., Ferlie, E., and McKee, L. (1992). Shaping strategic
change: The case of the National Health System. London: Sage
Publications.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Cambridge, MA:
Ballinger Publishing Company.
Pfeffer, J. (1983). Coalitions. In R. W. Allen and L. Porter (Eds.),
Organizational influence processes (pp. 312-320). M. E. Sharpe.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of
organizations. New York: Harper Collins.
Phillips, W. R. et al. (1997). Public dollars, common sense: New
roles for financial managers. Washington, DC: Coopers and Lybrand.
Poister, T. H. (1992). Productivity monitoring: Systems, indicators,
and analysis. In M. Holzer (Ed.), Public productivity handbook
(pp. 195-212). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Poister, T. H. and McGowan, R. P. (1984). The use of management tools
in municipal government: A national survey. Public Administration
Review, 44(3): 215-223.
Poister, T. H. and Streib, G. (1994). Municipal management tools from
1976 to 1993: An overview and update. Public Productivity and
Management Review, 18(2): 115-125.
Poister, T. H. and Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in
municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public
Administration Review, 59(4): 325-335.
Portland, Oregon, City of. Office of the City Auditor. (1995).
Service efforts and accomplishments: 1993-94. Fourth annual report on
city government performance summary. Portland, OR: Office of the
City Auditor. January.
Portland, Oregon, City of. Office of the City Auditor. (1998). City
of Portland service efforts and accomplishments: 1996-97.
Portland, OR: Office of the City Auditor. April.
Radin, B. A. (1997). Performance-based management and its training
implications. Paper prepared for the international symposium on
performance-based management and its training implications. Caserta,
Italy, September 24-26.
Radin, B. A. (1998). The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA):
Hydra-headed monster or flexible management tool? Public
Administration Review, 58(4): 307-316.
Rainey, H. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations
(2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Reichardt, C. S. (1988). Estimating effects. Unpublished
manuscript. Denver, CO: Department of Psychology, University of Denver.
Reichers, A. E. and Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An
evolution of constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational
climate and culture (pp. 5-39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rich, W. and Winn, M. (1992). The politics of public productivity. In
M. Holzer (Ed.), Public productivity handbook (pp. 63-78). New
York: Marcel Dekker.
Ridley, C. E. and Simon, H. A. (1943). Measuring municipal
activities: A survey of suggested criteria for appraising
administration. Chicago, IL: International City Managers'
Association.
Rivenbark, W. C. and Carter, K. L. (2000). Benchmarking and cost
accounting: The North Carolina approach. Journal of Public
Budgeting, Accounting &Financial Management, 12(1): 125-137.
Rossi, P. H. and Howard, E. F. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic
approach (5th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Routh, M. G. (1994). Case study: St. Pete Beach and its performance
measurement system (Perform). Public Management, 76(9): S21.
Rubin, M. A. (1991). Sanitation collection and disposal: Service
efforts and accomplishments reporting-Its time has come. Norwalk,
CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
Rubin, I. (1996). Budgeting for accountability: Municipal budgeting for
the 1990s. Public Budgeting and Finance, 16(2): 112-132.
Savageau, D. and D'Agostino, R. (2000). Places rated almanac.
Foster City, CA: IDG Books Worldwide.
Savageau, D. and Loftus, G. (1997).
Places rated almanac. New York: Macmillan.
Schultz, G. R. (1997). Water distribution systems. In A. E. Cote and J.
L. Linville (Eds.), Fire protection handbook (18th ed., pp.
6.31-6.49). Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
Savannah, City of. (1996). Neighborhood quality benchmarks: 1996 report
to the community. Savannah, GA: City of Savannah.
Scainblatt, A. (1977). Monitoring the outcomes of state mental
health treatment programs: Some initial suggestions. Washington DC:
The Urban Institute.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership: A
dynamic view (2nd Ed). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization
studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2): 229-240.
Schick, A. (1990). Budgeting for results: Recent developments in five
industrialized countries. Public Administration Review, 50(1):
26-34.
Schick, A. (1992). The Road to PPB: The stages of budget reform. In A.
C. Hyde (Ed.), Government budgeting: Theory, process, politics
(pp. 40-60). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc.
Schick, A. (1996). The spirit of reform: Managing the New Zealand
state sector in a time of change. Wellington: State Services
Commission.
Schick, A. and Hatry, H. (1982). Zero base budgeting: The manager
budget. Public Budgeting and Finance, 2(1): 72-87.
Scholtes, P. R. (1994). The team
handbook. Madison, WI: Joiner Associates Inc.
Schwabe, C. (1996). Development and use of performance indicators in
the city of Coral Springs, Florida. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center
for Accountability and Performance.
Snodgrass, R. E. (Ed.). (1995). In public service: Results-oriented
management in Ontario. CA Magazine, pp. 50-54.
Southern Growth Policies Board. (1996). Results-oriented government:
A guide to strategic planning and performance measurement in the public
sector. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.
Southern Growth Policies Board (1997).
Benchmarking best practices in the
public sector. [A training module produced by the Southern
Growth Policies Board and the Southern Consortium of University Public
Service Organizations]. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth
Policies Board.
Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission. (1990).
Standards for effective local government: A workbook for performance
assessment. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
Spendolini, M. J. (1992). The benchmarking book. New York, NY:
AMACOM. A Division of American Management Association.
Spendolim, M. J. (2000). The
benchmarking book (2nd ed.). New York: AMACOM.
State of Minnesota Planning. (1999). Children's report card. St.
Paul, MN: State of Minnesota Planning.
Stipak, B. (1979). Citizen
satisfaction with urban services: Potential misuse as a performance
indicator. Public Administration Review,
39(1): 46.
Stokey, E. and Zeckhauser, R. (1978). A primer for policy analysis.
Boston, MA: Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Sustainable Seattle. (1998). Indicators of sustainable community: A
status report on long-term cultural, economic, and environmental health
for Seattle/King County. Seattle, WA: Sustainable Seattle.
Swanson, W. (1995). Measuring up against the best. Minnesota
Technology (Summer).
Swindell, D. (2000). Linking
citizen satisfaction data to performance measures: A preliminary
examination. Public Performance & Management Review,
24(1): 30-52.
Swiss, J. E. (1992). Adapting Total quality management (TQM) to
government. Public Administration Review, 52(4): 356-362.
Texas Governors Office of Budget and Planning. (1995). Strategic
planning and budgeting in the 'New Texas': Putting service efforts and
accomplishments to Work. International Journal of Public
Administration, 18(2&3): 409-441.
Texas State Auditor Office. Accountability for Texas tomorrow:
Performance based budgeting - Improving accountability for the state.
Austin, TX: Texas State Auditor Office. (Report Number 3-119).
Texas State Auditor Office, Legislative Budget Board and the Governor
Office of Budget and Planning. (1995). Guide to performance
measurement for state agencies, universities, and health Related
institutions. Austin, TX: Author.
Thompson, L. H. (1991). Service to the public: How effective and
responsive is the government? (Statement before the U.S. House of
Representatives Committee on Ways and Means, GAO/T- HRD-91-26).
Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
Thompson, F. (1994). Mission-driven, results-oriented budgeting: Fiscal
administration and the New Public Management. Public Budgeting and
Finance, 14(3): 90-105.
Tigue, P. and Dennis, S. (1994). The use of performance measures in
city and county budgets. Chicago, IL: Government Finance Officers
Association.
The Treasury, Government of New Zealand. (1995). Purchase agreement
guidelines 1996: With best practices for output performance measures.
Wellington: The Treasury, Government of New Zealand.
Torgovnik, E. and Preisler, E.
(1988). Effectiveness assessment in public service systems.
Human Relations, 41(2): 103-118.
Trosa, S. (1997). Public sector reform strategy: A giant leap or a small
step? In J. Mayne and Z. Eduardo (Eds.), In monitoring performance in
the public sector: Future directions for international experience.
New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
United Way for the Greater New Orleans Area. (1995). Service
effectiveness assessment manual. New Orleans, LA: United Way of the
Greater New Orleans Area.
United Way of America. (1997). Workbook from United Way of America's
forum on outcomes II. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
The United Way Outcomes Project. (1998). Lessons learned III: Using
outcome data. Milwaukee, WI: The United Way of Greater Milwaukee.
U.S. Congressional Budget Office (1993). Using performance measures
in the federal budget process. Washington, DC: Government Printing
Office.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Data collections standards.
Policy and Standards Memo #47-95.
U.S. Department of Education. (1999). FY 2000 annual plan.
Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector
General. (1990). Technical assistance guides for conducting program
evaluations and inspections. Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector
General. Office of Evaluation and Inspections.
_____(1994). Practical Evaluation for Public Managers: Getting the
Information You Need. Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1997). Mapping
your community: Using geographic information to strengthen community
initiatives. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1996). Use of performance
information in the Chesapeake Bay program. Washington, DC: American
Society for Public Administration.
U.S. Executive Office of the President of the United States, Office of
Management and Budget. (1995). Making government work: Chapters 11,
12, and 13 from the Budget of the United States Government for Fiscal
Year 1996. Washington, D.C.: Author.
____ (1996). Implementation of the Government Performance and Results
Act of 1993. Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and
independent agencies. From Alice M. Rivlin. Washington, DC: Author.
April 11.
____ (1996). Budget supplement: Reprint of Chapter 13 and Chapter 14
from the Budget of the United States Government for Fiscal Year 1997.
Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Executive Office of the Vice President of the United States (1993).
From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and
costs less. Report of the National Performance Review. Washington,
DC: Author. September.
____ (1993). From red tape to results. Creating a government that
works better and costs less, creating quality leadership and management.
Accompanying report to the National Performance Review. Washington,
DC: Author. September.
____ (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that
works better and costs less. Rethinking program design. Accompanying
report to the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: Author.
September.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1988). Government auditing standards.
Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1993). Management reform: GAO's comments on the National
Performance Review's recommendations. Washington, DC: Author.
December.
_____(1993). Developing and using questionnaires. Washington, DC:
Author. October.
_____(1993). Performance budgeting: State experiences and
implications for the Federal government. Report to the director of the
Office of Management and Budget. Washington, DC: Author. February.
_____(1993). Performance budgeting: State experiences and
implications for the Federal government. Washington, DC: Government
Printing Office.
_____(1994). Government auditing standards, 1994 Revision.
Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1994). Management reform: Implementation of the National
Performance Review recommendations. Washington, DC: Government
Printing Office.
_____(1994). Managing for results: State experiences provide insights
for federal management reforms. Washington, DC: Government Printing
Office.
_____(1995). Managing for results: The Department of Justice's
initial efforts to implement GPRA. Washington, DC: Government
Printing Office.
_____(1995). Managing for results: State experiences provide insights
for federal management reforms. Washington, DC: Author. May.
_____(1995). The Department of Justice's initial efforts to implement
GPRA. Washington, DC: Author. June.
_____(1996). Government Performance and Results Act Performance
Reports. (GAO/GGD-96-66R). Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1996). Executive guide: Effectively implementing the Government
Performance and Results Act. Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1996). Motor vehicle safety: Comprehensive state programs offer
best opportunity for increasing use of safety belts. Washington, DC:
Author.
_____(1997). Agencies' strategic plan under GPRA: Key questions to
facilitate congressional review. (GAO/GGD-10.1.16). Washington, DC:
Author.
_____(1997). Business process reengineering assessment guide.
(GAO/AIMD-10.1.15) Washington, DC: Author.
_____ (1997). The Government Performance and Results Act: 1997
government-wide implementation will be uneven. Washington, DC:
Author.
_____(1998). Agencies' annual performance plans under the Results
Act: An assessment guide to facilitate congressional decision-making,
Version One. Washington, DC: Author.
_____1998). Managing for results: Agencies' annual performance plans
can help address strategic planning challenges. Washington, DC:
Author.
_____(1998). Performance budgeting: Past initiatives offer insights
for GPRA implementation. Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1998). Program evaluation: Agencies challenged by new demand
for information on program results. Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1998). The Results Act: An evaluator's guide to assessing
agency annual performance plans, Version One. Washington, DC:
Author.
_____ (1999). Performance budgeting: Initial agency experiences
provide a foundation to assess future directions.
(GAO/T-AIMD-GGD-99-216, July 1). Washington, DC: General Accounting
Office.
U.S. National Performance Review (NPR) (1994). Putting customers
first: Standards for serving the American people. Washington, DC:
Government Printing Office.
_____(1996). Reinvention next steps: Governing in a balanced budget
world. Speech by Vice President Al Gore and supporting background
papers, 4 March. Washington, DC: National Performance Review.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (1980). Managers guide for
improving productivity. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1996). Making government work:
Budget of the United States government. Washington, DC: Author.
Usher, C. L. and Cornia, G. C. (1981). Goal setting and performance
assessment in municipal budgeting. Public Administration Review,
41(2): 229-235.
Utah Legislative Research and General Counsel (1996). Utah tomorrow.
Utah: Author. February.
Van Johnston, R. (1995). Caveat emptor:
Customers vs. citizens. Public Manager, 24(3): 11-14.
Van Wert , J. M. (2002).
E-government and performance: A citizen-centered imperative.
Public Manager, 31(2): 16-20.
Virginia Department of Planning and Budget (1993). Performance
measures pilot project. VA: Author. December.
____ (1994). A strategic planning and performance measurement
proposal for the commonwealth of Virginia. VA: Author. December.
Walker, D. M. (2001). Managing by results to
benefit our Citizens. Public Manager, 30(3): 17-21.
Walker, M. (1994). Managers measure
efficiency with citizen surveys. American City & County, 109(10):
47.
Walters, J. (1994). The reality of
reinvention. Governing , 7(5): 53-60.
Walters, J. (1997). Performance and
pain. Governing, June: 26-31.
Walters, J. (1998). Measuring up: Governing's guide to performance
measurement for geniuses and other public managers. Washington, DC:
Governing Books.
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission. (1999). WSSC's proposed
FY'00 budget: Performance and outcome measures. Laurel, MD: Author.
Webler, T. and Tuler, S. (2000). Fairness and
competence in citizen participation theoretical reflections from a case
study. Administration & Society, 32(5): 566-595.
Weidner, M. and Noss-Reavely, M. (1996). The council on human
investment: Performance governance in Iowa. Washington, DC: ASPA's
Center for Accountability and Performance.
White, J. (1994). (Almost) Nothing new under the sun: Why the work of
budgeting remains incremental. Public Budgeting and Finance,
14(1): 113-134.
Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance.
Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Wholey, J. S. (1983). Evaluation and effective public management.
Boston: Little Brown.
Wholey, J. S. and Hatry, H. P. (1992). The case for performance
monitoring. Public Administration Review, 52(6): 604-610.
Wholey, J. S., Hatry, H. P. and Newcomer, K. E. (Eds.). (1994).
Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wilkins, K. (1996). Performance measurement; A work in progress.
Minnesota's Department of Labor and Industry. Washington, DC: ASPA's
Center for Accountability and Performance.
Winnie, R., Hatry. H. P., and Wright, V. (1977). Jobs and earnings
for state citizens: Monitoring the outcomes of state economic
development and employment and training programs. Washington, DC:
The Urban Institute.
The World Bank, The International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development. (1998). Public expenditure management handbook.
Washington, DC: The World Bank, The International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development.
The World Bank Operations Policy Department. (1996). Performance
monitoring indicators: A handbook for task managers. Washington, DC:
The World Bank Operations Policy Department.
Wray, L. (1997). Performance measurement to achieve quality of life:
Adding value through citizens. Public Management, 79(8): 4-7.
Wye, C. G. and Hatry, H. P. (1988). (Eds.). Timely, low-cost
evaluation in the public sector. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Yates, D., Jr. (1995). The politics of management: Exploring the
inner workings of public and private organizations. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass.
