RECOMMENDED SERVICE EFFORTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS (SEA) REPORTING INDICATORS FOR PARKS AND RECREATION

 The Urban Institute identifies the following objectives for parks and recreation services (Urban Institute 1992, pp. 36-37).

 Enjoyableness

  • Avoidance of crowdness
  • Physical Attractiveness
  • Maintenance of facilities
  • Safety
  • Accessibility
  • Variety of interesting activities
  • Helpfulness of the staff

 

Recommended Performance Measures are by and large attained by a) by household or user survey; b) trained observer ratings; c) attendance statistics and estimates. They are as follows:

INPUTS

  • Expenditures

    • Total

    • By program/activity

  • Labor hours

    • Total

    • By program/activity

OUTPUTS

  • Percentage of community households using (or not using) community park or recreational facilities at least over a specific past period, such as three months

  • Number of visits at park and recreation sites

  • Number of serious injuries (say, per 10,000 visits)

  • Number of criminal incidents

  • Percentage of facilities with one or more safety hazards

 OUTCOMES/QUALITY

  • Percentage of households rating neighborhood park and recreation facilities as satisfactory

  • Percentage of those households using community park or recreation facilities and programs who rate them as satisfactory

  • Percentage of user households rating community households as too crowded

  • Percentage of nonuser households giving crowded conditions as a reason for nonuse of facilities

  • Average peak-hour attendance divided by capacity

  • Percentage of user households rating physical attractiveness of neighborhood park and recreation facilities as satisfactory

  • Percentage of nonuser households giving physical unattractiveness as a reason for nonuse of facilities

  • Percentage of user households rating cleanliness as satisfactory

  • Percentage of facilities whose cleanliness is rated satisfactory by a trained observer

  • Percentage of user households rating the condition of facilities/equipment as satisfactory

  • Percentage of parks and other recreation facilities whose physical condition is rated as satisfactory (by a trained observer). Ratings should also be presented for specific features--lawns, playing areas, rest rooms, benches and picnic tables, and so forth.

  • Percentage of user households rating safety of facilities as satisfactory

  • Percentage of non-user households giving lack of safety as a reason for nonuse of facilities

  • Percentage of user households rating hours of operation as satisfactory

  • percentage of nonuser households giving unsatisfactory operating hours as a reason for nonuse

  • Percentage of user households rating the variety of program activities as satisfactory

  • Percentage of nonuser households giving lack of program variety as a reason for nonuse

  • Percentage of user households rating helpfulness or the attitude of the staff as satisfactory

  • Percentage of nonuser households giving poor staff attitude as reason for nonuse

 EFFICIENCY

Ratio of inputs to outputs:

  • Average dollar cost of a program per patron

  • Average dollar cost of a program per satisfied patron

  • Average dollar cost of maintenance of a unit of park area (acres, sq. feet, etc.)

Measures related to outcomes/quality:

  • Number of facilities/equipment maintained in a "satisfactory" condition per dollar of expenditure

  • Number of facilities maintained in a "satisfactory" clean condition per dollar of expenditure

 EXPLANATORY DATA

  • Weather (degree days, etc.)

  • Percentage of citizens living within (or not within) 15 to 30 minutes of travel time of a community park or recreation facility, distinguished by type of facility and principal relevant mode of transportation

  • Percentage of user households rating accessibility as satisfactory

  • Percentage of nonuser households giving poor physical accessibility as a reason for nonuse

 


Return to Teaching Resources

 

 







 

| NCPP Home Page | Policy Statement | CDGP Home Page |
 |
Curricular Resources | Graduate Department for Public Administration |
Updated July 29, 2003