he purpose of this bibliography is to provide a list of performance
measurement and citizen participation resources for educators. In
addition, an
annotated list of references is also provided on
this site.
Allen, J.
R. (1996). The uses of performance measurement. Government Finance Review,
12(4), 11-16.
American
Nurses Association. (1996). Nursing quality indicators: Definitions and
implications. Washington, D.C.: American Nurses Association.
American
Nurses Association. (1996). Nursing quality indicators: Guide for
implementation. Washington, D.C.: American Nurses Association.
American Productivity and Quality Center.
(1994). The benchmarking management guide. Portland, OR: Productivity
Press.
Ammons,
D. N. (1994). The role of professional associations in establishing and
promoting performance standards for local government.
Public Productivity and Management Review,
17(3), 281-298.
Ammons,
D. N. (1995). Overcoming the inadequacies of performance measurement in local
government: The case of libraries and leisure services.
Public Administration Review,
55 (1), 37-47.
Ammons,
D. N. (1995). Accountability for performance: Measurement and monitoring in
local government. Washington, DC: ICMA.
Ammons,
D. N. (1996). Local government standards via professional associations: How
useful are they for gauging performance? In A. Halachmi and G. Bouckaert (Eds.),
Organizational performance and measurement
in the public sector.
Westport, CT: Quorum.
Ammons, D. N. (1996). Municipal benchmarks: Assessing local performance and
establishing community standards. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ammons,
D. N. (2000). Benchmarking as a performance management tool: Experiences among
municipalities in North Carolina. Journal o f
Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial
Management, 12(1), 106-124.
Ammons,
D. N. (2000). Performance benchmarks in local government risk management.
Fairfax, VA: Public Entity Risk Institute.
Ammons, D. N., Coe, C., and Lombardo, M. (2001).
Performance comparison projects in local government: Participants' perspective.
Public Administration Review,
61(1), 100-110.
Andersen,
B. and Pettersen, P. (1996). The benchmarking handbook: Step-by-step instructions. London:
Chapman & Hall.
Aristigueta, M. (1998). Managing for
results in state government. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books.
Arizona
Governor's Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting. (1995). Managing for
results: Strategic planning and performance measurement handbook. Arizona:
Governor's Office for Excellence in Governing.
Asher, C.
(1992). Polling and the public: What every citizen should know.
Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Association of Oregon Counties. (1994). Governing for results: Using
benchmarks to define and measure progress toward strategic priorities. Oregon:
Association of Oregon Counties.
Auditor General of Canada. (1997).
Moving toward managing for results: Report of the auditor general of Canada to
the House of Commons. Ottawa: Minister of
Public Works and Services.
Austin, City of, Texas (1999). Citizens
prioritizing city services: 1999 citizen survey results. City of Austin,
Texas.
Barrett,
K. and Greene, R. (1994). The state of the cities: Managing for results.
Financial World, 163(3), 40-43.
Barrett, K. and Greene, R. (1994). Managing
for results: Phoenix. Financial World, 163(3), 47.
Barrett, K. and Greene, R. (1995).
State of the states 1995: Tick, tick, tick. Financial World, 164(20),
36-39.
Barrett,
K. and Greene, R. (2000). Grading the cities: A management report card. Governing, 13, 22-91.
Baugher, D
(Ed.) (1981). Measuring effectiveness.
New directions for program evaluation series, No. 11. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Behn, R. D. (1992). Bottom-line government.
Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy, the Governors Center at Duke
University.
Behn, R. D. (1997). Broken windows and
production targets. Governing. Available at:
http://www.governing.com/archive/1997/mar/manage.txt
Bens, C.
K. (1986). Strategies for implementing performance measurement.
Management Information Service Report, 18: 1-14. Washington, D.C.: ICMA.
Berry, M.
and Ikerd, J. (1996). Outcome budgeting: Catawba County, NC. Washington,
DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and Performance.
Blanche-Kapplen, S. and Lissman, L. (1996). Development and use of outcome
information in government: Oregon adult and family services. Washington, DC:
ASPA's Center for Accountability and Performance.
Blodgett,
J. and Newfarmer, G. (1996). Performance measurement (Arguably): The hottest
topic in government today. Public Management, 78, 6.
Bouckaert,
G. (1992). Public productivity in retrospective. In M. Holzer (Ed.) Public
productivity handbook (pp. 5- 46). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Bowden,
M. (1996). Development and use of outcome information in government: Oregon
Department of Transportation. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for
Accountability and Performance.
Bowerman, M. (1995). Auditing performance
indicators: The role of the audit commission in the citizen’s charter
initiative. Financial Accountability & Management,
11(2), 171.
Bowsher, C. (1993). Improving government:
Measuring performance and acting on proposals for change. Testimony before
the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Legislation and National
Security, Committee on Government Operations.
Boxwell,
R. J., Jr. (1994). Benchmarking for competitive advantage. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Brassard, M. (1989).
The memory jogger plus. Methuen: GOAL/ QPC.
Brizius,
J. A. and Campbell, M.D. (1991). Getting results: A guide for government
accountability. Washington, DC: Council of Governors' Policy Advisors.
Broom, C., Jackson, M., Vogelsang Coombs, V.
and Harris, J. (1998). Performance measurement: Concepts and
techniques. Washington, DC.
Broom, C. A. and McGuire, L. A. (1995). Performance-based government models:
Building a track record. Public Budgeting and Finance Journal. 15 (4),
3-17.
Bruder,
K. A., Jr. and Gray, E. M. (1994).
Public sector benchmarking: A practical approach. Public Management,
76(9), S9.
Bryant,
S. (1996). Development and use of outcome measures: Long Beach Police
Department, Long Beach, CA. Washington, DC: ASPAS' Center for Accountability
and Performance.
Cabrero-Mendoza, E. (2000). Mexican
local governance in transition: Fleeting change or permanent transformation?
American Review of Public Administration, 30(4), 374-388.
Camall,
C. A. (1995). Managing change in organizations. (2nd ed.) London:
Prentice Hall.
Campbell, M. D. (1997). Outcome and performance measurement systems: An
overview. Alliance for Redesigning Government at. Available at:
http://www.alliance.napawash.org/ALLIANCE
/Picases.nsf/.
Canadian
Comprehensive Auditing Foundation. (1987). Effectiveness: Reporting and
auditing in the public sector. Ottawa: Canadian Comprehensive Auditing
Foundation.
Cannon,
J. (1996). Utah tomorrow. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for
Accountability and Performance.
Capezio, P. & Morehouse, D. (1995). Taking
the mystery out of TQM: A practical guide to Total Quality Management. (2nd
ed.) Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press.
Carter, R. K. (1983). The accountable agency.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Carter, K. (1994). Performance budgets:
Here by popular demand. State Legislatures, December, 22-25.
Carter, K. (1996). Measuring performance
improves budgeting. National Conference of State Legislatures LegisBrief,
February, 4-7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
(1998). Youth risk behavior surveillance: United States, 1997. Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report, 14.
Chan, A.
(1994). Managing a government like a
business: The Sunnyvale system. Government Finance Review, 10(2), 7-11.
Chelimsky,
E. (1997). The coming transformations in evaluation. In E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish
(Eds). Evaluation for the 21st century (pp. 1-26). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Cheurprakobkit, S. (2000). Police-citizen
contact and police performance. Journal of Criminal Justice,
28(4), 325-336.
Cheurprakobkit, S. and Bartsch, R. A. (2001).
Police performance: A model for assessing citizens & rsquo satisfaction and the
importance of police attributes. Police Quarterly,
4(4), 449-468.
Chief
Finance Officers (CFO). (1998). Integrating performance measurement into the
budget process. FinanceNet. Available at:
http://www.financenet.gov/financenet/fed/cfo/gpra/ipmibp.htm.
Christenson, L. (1996). Integration of business plan, strategic plan,
customer service plan, unit self assessment and employee performance appraisals:
Washington State Department of Labor and Industry. Washington, DC: ASPA's
Center for Accountability and Performance.
Claudle,
S. L. (1987). Productivity politics: Gilding the farthing. Public
Productivity Review, 44, 39-51.
Coe, C.
(1999). Local government benchmarking: Lessons from two major multi-government
efforts. Public Administration Review, 59(2), 110-115.
Coffey,
J. (Ed.) (1993). Resource manual for
customer surveys. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.
Colwell,
W. L., & Koletar, J. W. (1984). Performance measurement for criminal justice:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) experience. Public Productivity
Review, 8(3), 207-224.
Communications and Coordination Directorate, Treasury Board of Canada, Office of
the Comptroller General, Evaluation and Audit Branch. (1992). Your guide to
measuring client satisfaction. Ottawa: Communications and Coordination
Directorate, Treasury Board of Canada, Office of the Comptroller General,
Evaluation and Audit Branch.
Cope, G.
H. (1987). Local government budgeting and productivity: Friends or foes?
Public Productivity Review,
10(3), 45-57.
Cope, G.
H. (1992). Walking the fiscal tightrope: Local government budgeting and fiscal
stress. International Journal of Public
Administration, 15(5), 1097-1120.
Cothran, D. A. (1993). Entrepreneurial budgeting: An emerging reform? Public
Administration Review, 53(5), 445-454
Critchlow,
D. (1985). The Brookings Institution, 1916-1952: Expertise and the public
interest in a democratic society. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University
Press.
Croly, H. (1909). The promise of American life. New
York: Macmillan.
Curcio,
C. F. (1996). Performance indicators: Phoenix Parks, Recreation and Library
Department. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and
Performance.
Del'Agostino, B. (1995). Observations
about performance budgets from California. The Fiscal Letter , 17(4),
4-5, 10-11.
Devlin,
S. J., Dong, H.K. & Brown, M. (1993). Selecting a scale for measuring quality. Marketing
Research, 5(3), 12-17.
Dillman.
D. A. (1991). The design and administration of
mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 225-249.
Dimock,
M. E. (1936). Criteria and objectives of public administration. In J. Gans, L.
White, and M. Dimock (Eds.), The frontiers of public administration. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Downs, G. W. and Larkey, P D. (1986).
The search for government efficiency: From hubris to helplessness.
New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Drucker,
P. F. (1975). Management: Tasks, responsibilities and practices. New
York: Harper & Row.
DuPont-Morales, M.A. and Harris, J. E. (1994).
Strengthening accountability: Incorporating strategic planning and performance
measurement into budgetings. Public Productivity & Management Review,
17(3): 231-239.
Ehrenhalt, A. (1994).
Performance budgeting: The name is... .Governing, 8(2): 9-10.
ElectriCities of North Carolina, Inc. (1997). 1997
Key Performance Indicators.
Raleigh, NC: ElectriCities of North Carolina, Inc.
Epstein,
P. D. (1984). Using performance
measurement in local government: A guide to improving decisions, performance and
accountability. Council on Municipal Performance Series. New York, NY: Van
Nostrand Reinhold Company, Inc.
Epstein,
P. (1992). Measuring the performance of public service. In M. Holzer (Ed.),
Public productivity handbook (pp. 161-194). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
Ferber,
R., Sheatsley, P., Turner, A., and Waksberg, J.
(1981). What is a survey?
Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
Few, P.
K. and Vogt, A. J. (1997). Measuring the performance of local governments in
North Carolina. Government Finance Review,
13(4): 29-34.
Finch, J.
C. (1995). Managing for results: Status of the Government Performance and
Results Act. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Government Management,
Information and Technology, US House of Representatives. Washington, DC:
Government Printing Office.
Fischer,
F. (1994). Organizational expertise and bureaucratic control: Behavioral science
as managerial ideology. In F. Fischer. and C. Sirianni (Eds.), Critical
studies in organization and bureaucracy (pp. 174-195). Philadelphia, PA:
Temple University Press.
Fischer,
F. (1986). Reforming bureaucratic theory: Toward a political model. In D. J.
Calista and S. S. Nagel (Eds.), Bureaucratic and governmental reform (pp.
35-53). Jai Pr., Inc.
Fischer,
R. J. (1994). An overview of performance measurement. Public Management ,
76(9): S2.
Fitzenz,
J. (1993). Benchmarking staff performance.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
The
Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People (1995). The
annual progress report from the Florida Commission on Government Accountability
to the People. 1994-1995. Florida: Executive Office of the Governor.
The
Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People
(1995). Tracking the impact of state agencies on Florida's citizens: An
assessment of the Department of Corrections' Goal to Reduce Recidivism. A report
from the Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People. July.
Florida: Executive Office of the Governor.
The
Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People
(1996). The Florida benchmarks report. February. Florida:
Executive Office of the Governor.
The
Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People
(1997). Performance-based program
budgeting in context. Tallahassee, FL: Office of Program Policy Analysis and
Government Accountability.
Folz, D. H. (1996). Survey for public
administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fountain,
J. (1995). Establishing a system of
managing for results. Olympia association of government accountants spring
symposium. Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
Fountain,
J. (1997). Are state and local governments using performance measures? PA
Times, 20 (1): PM2, PM8.
Friedman,
M. (1997). A guide to developing and using performance measures in
results-based budgeting. Washington, DC: The Finance Project.
Fund for
the City of New York, Center on Municipal Government Performance. (1998). How
smooth are New York City's streets?
New York: Fund for the City of New York, Center on Municipal Government
Performance.
Gardner,
J. (1994). American renewal: Adding
spirit to communities. Public Management, 76(9) : 8-12.
Gerber,
B. (1990). Benchmarking: Measuring
yourself against the best. Training. Minneapolis, MN: Lakewood
Publications Inc.
Gianakis, G. (1996). Integrating performance measurement and budgeting. In A.
Halachmi and G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Organizational performance and measurement
in public sector: Toward service, effort and accomplishment reporting.
Westport: Quorum Books.
Glaser, M. A. (1999). Service delivery satisfaction
and willingness to pay taxes: Citizen recognition of local government
performance. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(1): 48-67.
Glaser, M. A. (2000). Local government performance
through the eyes of citizens. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting &
Financial Management, 12(1): 49-73.
Glover,
M. (1993). Performance measurement: Local
government efforts and successes. Paper presented at the annual
meeting of the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration, Cocoa Beach,
FL.
Goetz, A. M. and Jenkins, R. (2001). Hybrid forms of
accountability: Citizen engagement in institutions of public-sector oversight in
India. Public Management Review, 3(3): 362-363.
Goodsell,
C. T. (1995). From bureaucrat bashing
to institution trashing. PA Times, 18 (2) : 11.
Gore, A.
(1990). Service efforts and
accomplishments reporting: Its time has come - Sanitation collection and
disposal. Research report series. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
Gore, A.
(1991). Service efforts and
accomplishments reporting: Its time has come - Mass transit.
Research report series. Norwalk, CT:
GASB.
Gore, A.
(1996). Reinvention's next steps:
Governing in a balanced budget world. A Speech by Vice President Al Gore and
Supporting Background Papers. National Performance Review. Washington, D.C.
Gormley,
W. T. and Weimer, D. A. (1999). Organizational report cards. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
(1992). Preliminary views of the Governmental Accounting Standards
Board on concepts related to service efforts and accomplishments reporting.
Norwalk, CT: GASB.
Government Finance Officers Association. (1993). Distinguished budget
presentation awards program: Awards criteria. Chicago: Government Finance
Officers Association.
Government of Costa Rica & the World Bank. (1996). Guidelines for drafting
compromiso de resultados. San Jose, Costa Rica.
Greenberg, D. H. and Appenzeller, U. (1998). Cost analysis step by step: A
how to guide for planners and providers of welfare-to-work and other employment
and training programs. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research
Corporation.
Greenway,
M. T. and Hatry, H. E. (1996). Focusing on program outcomes: Summary guide.
Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
Greiner, J. M., Hatry, H. E., Koss, M. E,
Millar, A. E., & Woodward, J. P. (1981). Productivity and motivation: A
review of
state and local government initiatives.
Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Grifel, S. S. (1993). Performance measurement and
budgeting decision making. Public Productivity and Management Review,
16(4): 403-407.
Grifel,
S. S. (1994). Organizational culture: Its importance in performance measurement.
Public Management, 76(9): S19.
Grizzle,
G. A. (1987). Linking performance to funding decisions: What is the budgeter's
role? Public Productivity Review, 10(3): 33-44.
Halachmi,
A. (Ed.) (1999). Performance and quality measurement in government.
Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
Halachmi,
A. and Bouckaert, G. (Eds.) (1996). Organizational performance
and measurement in the public sector:
Toward service, effort and accomplishment reporting. Westport, Conn.: Quorum
Books.
Hardy, C. (1985). The management of organizational
closure. Aldershot: Gower.
Harrison,
S. (1999). Propaganda, persuasion and symmetry: Local and central government
perspectives on communicating with the citizen. British Journal of
Management, 10(1): 53-62.
Harvey,
E. and Mills, R. (1970). Patterns of organizational adaptation. In M. Zald
(Ed.), Power in organizations. Nashville, TN: Vandervilt University
Press.
Harvey,
J. (1987). Measuring Productivity in Professional Services. Public
Productivity Review, 44: 29-38.
Hatry, H. P. (1978). The status of
productivity measurement in the public sector.
Public Administration Review,
38(1): 28-33.
Hatry, H. P. (1980). Local government uses for
performance measurement. Intergovernmental
personnel notes (pp.
13-15). Washington, DC: Office of Personnel
Management.
Hatry, H. P., Gerhart, C., and Marshall, M.
(1994). Eleven ways to make performance measurement more useful to public
managers. Public Management, 76(9): S15-S18.
Hatry, H.
P., Mark F., Singer, T. O., and Liner, E. B.
(1990). A manual: Monitoring the outcomes of economic development
programs. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Hatry, H. P. (1986). Performance measurement
principles and techniques: An overview for local government.
Public Productivity Review,
4: 312-339.
Hatry, H.
P. (1993). How effective are your community services? Conference
Proceedings of the 1993 Managing for Results: Performance Measures in
Government. Austin, TA.
Hatry, H. P. (1999).
Performance measurement: Getting results.
Washington, DC: The Urban
Institute.
Hatry, H.
P., Blair, L., Fisk, D., Greiner, J. M., Hall, J. R., Jr, and Schaenman, P. S.
(1992). How effective are your community services. Washington, DC: The
Urban Institute and ICMA.
Hatry, H.
P., Fisk, D. M., and Winnie, R. W. (1981). Practical program evaluation for
state and local government. (2nd ed). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Hatry, H. P., Marcotte, J. E., Van Houten, T.,
and Weiss, C. H. (1998). Customer surveys for agency managers: What managers
need to know. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Hatry, H. P., Blair, L. H., Fisk, D. H.,
Greiner, J. M., Hall, J. R., Jr., and Schaenman, P. S. (1977). How effective
are your community services? Procedures for monitoring the effectiveness of
municipal services. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and the
International City Management Association.
Hatry, H.
P., Blair, L., Fisk, D., and Kimmel, W. (1987). Program analysis for state
and local governments. (2nd ed). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Hatry, P.
and Fisk, D. (1992). Measuring productivity in the public sector. In M. Holzer
(Ed.), Public productivity handbook (pp. 139-160). NY: Marcel Dekker.
Hatry, H.
P., Fountain, J. R., Jr., Sullivan, J. M., and Kremer, L. (1990). Service
efforts and accomplishments reporting: Its time has come. Norwalk, CT:
Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
Hatry, H. E. and Kopczynski, M. (1998).
Guide to program outcome measurement for the U.S. Department of
Education.
Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Hatry, H. P, Fountain, J. R., Jr., and Sullivan, J. M. (1990). Overview. In H. P
Hatry, J. R., Fountain, J. M. Sullivan, and L. Kremer (Eds.),
Service efforts and accomplishments reporting:
Its time has come: An overview (pp.
1-49). Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
Hatry, H.
P., Van Houten, T., Plantz, M., and Greenway, M. T. (1996). Measuring program
outcomes: A practical approach. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
Hauser,
R. M., Brown, B. V., & Prosser, W. R. (Eds.). (1997). Indicators
of children's well-being. New York:
Russell Sage Foundation.
Hawaii, State of. Auditor. (1994). Sunset
evaluation update: Nurses-A report to the governor and the Legislature
of the State of
Hawaii. Honolulu, HA: Auditor
of the State of Hawaii.
Hayllar,
M. P. (1999). Reforms to enhance accountability and citizen involvement: A case
study of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority. International Journal of Public
Administration, 22(3&4): 461.
Henry, G.
T. and Dickey, K. C. (1993). Implementing performance monitoring: A research and
development approach. Public Administration Review, 53(3): 203-212.
Ho, A.
T.-K. and Coates, P. (2002). Citizen participation: Legitimizing performance
measurement as a decision tool. Government Finance Review, 18(2): 8-10.
Holzer,
M. (1992). Mastering public productivity improvement. In M. Holzer (Ed.),
Public productivity handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Holzer,
M. and Halachmi, A. (1996). Measurement as a means of accountability.
International Journal of Public Administration, 19(11&12): 1921-1943.
Hosansky, D. (1994).
Tell Me Where The Money Went. State Legislatures: 26-30.
Howard,
R., and Schneider, L. (1994). Worker participation in technological change:
Interests, influence, and scope. In F. Fischer and C. Sirianni (Eds.),
Critical studies in organization and bureaucracy (rev. edition) (pp.
519-544). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Ikerd, J.
(1994). Case study: Catawba County
redesigns its budget system. Public Management, 76(9): S22.
Ingraham,
P. W. and Romzek, B. (1994). New
paradigms for government: Issues for the changing public service. Jossey-Bass
Public Administration Series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
The Innovation Group. Standard Reporting of Performance
Measures
International City/County Management Association. (1999).
Comparative performance measurement: FY
1997 data report. Washington, DC:
International City/County Management Association.
International City Managers Association (1994). Comparative Performance
Measurement Consortium. Washington, DC: ICMA.
Iowa
Department of Management (1996).
Technical and training handbook for budgeting for results. Des Moines, IA:
Iowa Department of Management.
Jackson,
M. (1996). Lessons learned from Minnesota's government performance report.
Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and Performance.
Jaede, A.
et al. (1996). Minnesota Milestones: 1996 progress report. MN: Minnesota
Planning. July.
Jonas, K.
(1996). The Development of performance measures for Virginia financial
oversight. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and Performance.
Jones, A.
(1997). Winston-Salem's participation in the North Carolina performance
measurement project. Government Finance
Review, 13(4): 35-36.
Joyce, P.
G. (1993). Using performance measures for federal budgeting: Proposals and
prospects. Public Budgeting and Finance, 13(4): 3-17.
Justice
Management Division, U.S. Department of Justice. (1995). DOJ manager's
handbook on developing useful performance indicators: Version 1.1, managing for
results. Washington, DC: Author. April.
Kamensky, J. M. (1993). Program performance measures:
Designing a system to manage for results. Public Productivity and Management
Review, 16(4): 395-402.
Kamensky,
J. M. (1995). Program performance measures: Designing a system to manage for
results. In A. Halachmi and M. Holzer (Eds.), Competent government: Theory
and practice: The best of public productivity and management review, 1985-1993.
(pp. 239-246). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
Karlof, B. and Ostblom, S. (1993).
Benchmarking: A signpost to excellence
in quality and productivity.
New York: John Wiley.
Keehley,
P. (1997). Benchmarking for best
practices in the public sector: Achieving performance breakthroughs in federal,
state, and local agencies. Jossey-Bass Public Administration Series. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kelly, J. M. and Swindell, D. (2002). Service
quality variation across urban space: First Steps toward a model of citizen
satisfaction. Journal of Urban Affairs,
24(3): 271-288.
Kettl, D.
F. (1993). Toward new governance:
Making process a priority. The La Follette Policy Report. 5 (2). Madison,
WI: La Follette Institute, University of Wisconsin.
Kettner,
P., Moroney, R. and Martin, L. (1990). Designing and managing programs: An
effectiveness based approach. Newbury Park: Sage.
Knezo, G.
J. (1995). Government Performance
and Results Act, P.L 103-62: Interim Status Report. (revised).
Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
Knight,
K. E. (1967). A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process.
Journal of Business, 40(4): 478-96.
Kopcynski,
M. and Lombardo, M. (1999). Comparative performance measurement: Insights and
lessons learned from a consortium effort. Public Administration Review,
59(2): 124-134.
Korman,
N. and Glennerster, H. (1985). Closing a hospital: The Derenth Park Project.
Occasional Papers on Social Administration, 78. London: Bedford Square
Press.
Kowalewski, R. (1996). Using outcome
information to redirect programs: A case of
the Coast Guard's pilot project under the
Government Performance and Results Act.
American Society for Public Administration Case Study F3. Washington, DC:
American Society for Public Administration.
Kravchuck, R. and Schack, R. (1996). Designing effective performance
measurement systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.
Public Administration Review, 56: 348-358.
LaPlante,
A. (1994). Sunnyvale: Performance-based
budgeting. Computerworld, 28(40): 90.
Lappin,
J., Figioni, P., and Sloan, S. (1994).
A primer on consumer marketing research: Procedures, methods, and tools.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
Larkey,
P. D. and Devereux, E. A. (1999). Good budgetary decision process. In H. G.
Frederickson and J. M. Johnston (Eds.), Public management reform and
innovation: Research, theory and application (pp. 166-188). Tuscaloosa:
University of Alabama Press.
Latsis, O. (1999). Citizens believe in the
government’s zeal. Current Digest of the Post Soviet Press,
51(39): 17.
League of
California Cities. (1994). A "how to" guide for assessing effective service
levels in California cities. Sacramento, CA: League of California Cities.
Legislative Budget Board, Texas Governor's
Office of Budget and Planning. (1996). Detailed instructions for preparing
and submitting requests for legislative appropriations for the biennium
beginning September 1, 1997-Executive and Administrative Agencies. Austin,
TX: Legislative Budget Board, Texas Governor's Office of Budget and Planning.
Legislative Budget Board, Texas Governor's
Office of Budget and Planning. (1998). Instructions for preparing and
submitting agency strategic plans: Fiscal Years 1999-2003. Austin, TX:
Legislative Budget Board, Texas Governor's Office of Budget and Planning.
Legislative Budget Board, Texas Governor's
Office of Budget and Planning. (1998). Planning for "Texas Tomorrow":
Instructions for preparing and submitting agency strategic plans for Fiscal Year
1999-2000. Austin, TX: Legislative Budget Board, Texas Governor's Office of
Budget and Planning.
LeGrotte,
R. B. (1987). Performance measurement in major U.S. cities. Unpublished
master's thesis. Denton, TX: North Texas State University.
Leibfried,
K. and McNair, C. (1992). Benchmarking: A tool for continuous improvement.
New York: HarperCollins.
Leithe, J. L. (1997). Implementing
performance measurement in government: Illustrations and resources. Chicago,
Ill.: Government Finance Officers Association.
Municipal Research and Services Center of
Washington. (1994). Level of service standards: Measures for maintaining the
quality of community life. Kirkland, WA: Municipal Research and Services
Center of Washington.
Lewis, D.
R., Johnson, D. S., Chen, T., and Erickson, R. N.
(1992). The use and reporting of
benefit-cost analyses by state vocational rehabilitation agencies. Evaluation
Review: A Journal of Applied Social Research, 16(3): 266-287.
Lichiello, P., Berkowitz, B., Thompson, J.,
Katz, A., and Perrin, E. B. (1998). Enabling
performance measurement
activities in the states and communities.
Seattle, WA: Northwest Prevention Effectiveness Center and the Health Policy
Analysis Program.
Linden,
R. (1993). Business process
reengineering: Newest fad or revolution in government? Public Management,
75(11): 9.
Liner, E.
B., Hatry, H. P., and Rossman, S. (1994). Measuring progress of estuary
programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Water: EPA 842-B-94-008 and 94-009.
Lipsey,
M. W. (1993). Theory as method. In L. B. Sechrest and A. G. Scott (Eds.), New
directions for program evaluation, 57: 5-38. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Lipsey, M. W. (1998). Unsolved mysteries and
methodological quandaries. Paper prepared for the Washington Evaluators
Conference, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
Lynch, T. D. and Day, S. E. (1996). Public sector performance measurement.
Public Administration Quarterly, 19 (4): 404-419.
Ma, D. K.-L. (2000). Delivering results on the
ground: Improving service to citizens in Singapore. Asian Journal of
Political Science, 8(2): 137-144.
MacManus,
S. A. (1984). Coping with retrenchment: Why local governments need to
restructure their budget document formats. Public Budgeting and Finance,
4: 58-66.
Magura, S. and Moses, B. S. (1986).
Outcome measures of child welfare services: Theory and applications.
Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of
America, Inc.
Mann, S.
(1986). Politics of public productivity. In M. Holzer and A. Halachmi (Eds.), Strategic
issues in public productivity: The best of public productivity 1975-1985
(pp. 33-45). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
Mark, J.
A.(1981). Measuring productivity in government-federal, state, and local.
Public Productivity Review, 5(1): 21-44.
Marshall,
M. (1996). Development and use of outcome information in government: Prince
William County, Virginia. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability
and Performance.
Marshall,
M. (1999). 21st century
community focus: Better results by linking citizens, government, and performance
measurement. Public Management, 81(10):
12-18.
Marshall,
M. (2000). 21st century
community governance: Better results by linking citizens, government, and
performance measurement. Quality Congress. ASQC…Annual Quality Congress
Proceedings, pp.214-223.
Martin,
D. W. (1992). The management classics and public productivity. In M. Holzer
(Ed.), Public productivity handbook (pp. 47-62). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Martin, L. L. (1997). Outcome budgeting: A new entrepreneurial approach to
budgeting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management,
9(1): 108-126.
Martin,
L. L. and Kettner, P. M. (1996). Measuring the performance of human service
programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mayne, J.
and Zapico-Gofi, E. (Eds.) (1997). Monitoring performance in the public
sector: Future directions from international experience. New Brunswick, NJ:
Transaction Books.
McGowan,
R. P. (1986). Improving efficiency in public management: The torment of sisyphus.
In M. Holzer and A. Halachmi (Eds.), Strategic issues in public productivity:
The best of public productivity review, 1975-1985 (pp. 17-31). Burke, VA:
Chatelaine Press.
McGowan,
R. P. and Poister, T. H. (1985). Impact of productivity measurement systems on
municipal performance. Policy Studies Review, 4 (3): 532-540.
McKevitt, D. and Lawton, A. (1996). The manager,
the citizen, the politician and performance measures. Public Money &
Management, 16(3): 49-54.
Mechanic,
D. (1962). Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations.
Administration Science Quarterly, 7(3): 349-364.
Mechlins,
J. (1994). Governing guide: The route to reengineering government. Governing,
7(5): 43-52.
Melkers, J. E. and Willoughby, K. G. (2001). Budgeters' views of state
performance- budgeting systems: Distinctions across branches. Public
Administration Review, 61(1): 54-64.
_______
(1998). The state of the states: Performance-based budgeting requirements in 47
out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58(1): 66-73.
Merjanian,
A. (1996). Strategic budgeting in Texas: A systems approach to planning,
budgeting, and performance measurement. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for
Accountability and Performance.
Michigan-
American Association for Public Opinion Research (1991). Code of
professional ethics and practices. Ann Arbor, MI, iii.
Millar,
A., Hatry, H. and Koss, M. (1977a). Monitoring the outcomes of social
services, Vol. I: Prelimnary suggestions. Washington DC: The Urban
Institute.
_______
(1977b). Monitoring the outcomes of social services, Vol. II: Review of past
research and test activities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Miller,
G. J. (2001). Introduction. In G. J. Miller, W. B. Hildreth, and J. Rabin
(Eds.), Performance-based budgeting. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Millar,
R. & Millar, A. (Eds.). (1981). Developing client outcome monitoring
systems: A guide for state and local social services agencies. Washington,
DC: Urban Institute Press.
Minnesota
Office of the Legislative Auditor. (1995). Best practices review: Snow and
ice control. MN: Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor. May.
_______
(1994). Performance budgeting. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Office of the
Legislative Auditor. February.
_______
(1995). Program evaluation division: State agency use of customer
satisfaction surveys [in Performance Reports]. MN: Minnesota Office of the
Legislative Auditor. October.
______
(1995). Development and use of the 1994 agency performance reports. St.
Paul, MN: Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor. July.
Montjoy, R. S. and Brudney, J. L. (1991).
Volunteers in the delivery of public services: Hidden costs. American
Review of Public Administration, 21(4): 327-344.
Mumford,
E. and Ward, T. (1966). Computers: Planning for people. London: Batsford.
Mumford,
E. and Ward, T. (1968). Computer technologists: Dilemmas of a new role.
Journal of Management Studies, 3: 244-255.
Mullen,
E. J. and Jennifer, M. L. (Eds.). (1997). Outcomes measurement in the human
services. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
Murphy, E. (2002). Best corporate citizens have
better financial performance. Strategic Finance, 83(7): 20-21.
National
Academy of Public Administration. (1998). Effective implementation of the
Government Performance and Results Act: A study by the panel on improving
government performance. Washington, DC: National Academy of Public
Administration.
National
Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting. (1998). Recommended budget
practices: A framework for improved state and local government budgeting.
Chicago, IL: Government Finance Officers Association.
National
Civic League. (1999). The civic index: Measuring your community's civic
health (2nd ed.). Denver, CO: Author.
National
Conference of State Legislatures (1994). The performance budget revisited: A
report on state budget reform. Legislative finance report. Washington, DC:
National Conference of State Legislatures. February.
National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1995). GPRA FY 1996 performance plan.
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1996). Strategic planning and
performance measurement. Washington, DC: American Society for Public
Administration.
Naumann,
E. and Kathleen, G. (1995). Customer satisfaction measurement and
management. Cincinnati, OH: Thomson Executive Press.
Newcomer,
K. E. and Wright, R. F. (1997). Effective use of performance measurement at the
federal level. The PA Times, 20(1): 2- 4.
New York,
City of., Office of Operations. Mayor's management report. New York:
Office of Operations, City of New York.
Norquist,
J. O. (1998). The wealth of cities: Revitalizing the centers of American
life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Nyhan, R.
C. and Marlowe, H. A., Jr.(1995). Performance measurement in the public
sector: Challenges and ppportunities. Public Productivity & Management
Review, 18(4): 333-348.
O'Connell, G. B. (1989). Rate your city: Here's how!. Public Management,
71(6): 7-10.
Office of
National Drug Control Policy. (1998). Performance measures of effectiveness:
A system for assessing the performance of the National Drug Control Strategy.
(NCJ 168953). Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy.
Office of
National Drug Control Policy. (1999). Performance measures of effectiveness:
Implementation and findings. (NCJ 174462). Washington, DC: Office of
National Drug Control Policy.
Olsen, R.
T. and Epstein, J. (1997). Performance management: So what? PA Times,
20(1): 1-7.
Oregon
Department of Administrative Services, Fiscal Policy Analysis Division. (1994).
Choice's for Oregon's future: 1995-97. Salem, OR: Budget and Legislative
Proposal Instructions.
Oregon
Department of Human Services. Adult and Family Services Division. (1994). A
brief history of the AFS performance measure system. Salem, OR: Oregon
Department of Human Services.
Oregon Progress Board. (1994). Oregon benchmarks and performance measures. A
report to the 1995. Legislature. December.
Oregon
Progress Board. (1994). Oregon benchmarks: Standards for measuring statewide
progress and institutional performance. A report to the 1995. Legislature.
December.
Oregon
Progress Board (1996a). Governing for results: Using Benchmarks to define and
measure progress toward strategic priorities. Salem, OR: Author.
Oregon
Progress Board (1996b). Oregon benchmarks-data directory. Salem, OR:
Author.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1997). In search of
results: Performance management practices. Paris: Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T (1992). Reinventing government: How the
entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA:
Addison Wesley.
O'Toole,
D. E. and Marshall, J. (1987). Budgeting practices in local government: The
state of the art. Government Finance Review, 3(5): 11-16.
O'Toole,
D. E. and Stipak, B. (1988). Budgeting and productivity revisited: The local
government picture. Public Productivity Review, 12(1): 1-12.
Ottawa
Office of the Comptroller General. (1992). Evaluation and audit branch: Your
guide to measuring client satisfaction. Ottawa: Office of the Comptroller
General. August.
Owen, B.
and Maliovich, P. (1995). Understanding the value of ISO 9000: A management
guide to higher quality, productivity, and sales. Knoxvill, TN: SPC Press.
Pepinsky, H. E. (1989). Issues of citizen involvement
in policing. Crime & Delinquency, 35(3): 458-470.
Perrin,
E. B. and Jeffrey J. K. (Eds.). (1997). Assessment of performance measures
for public health, substance abuse, and mental health. Washington, DC:
National Research Council, National Academy Press.
Perrow, C. (1972). Complex organizations. Glenview,
IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.
Perry, J.
L. (1989). Handbook of public administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Peters,
T. J. and Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from
America's best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.
Petersen,
J. E. (1994). Finance: Here's a city that's really being reinvented.
Governing, 75: 62.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of organizational decision-making.
London: Tavistock Publications.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 24(4): 570.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). Examining change in the long term context of culture
and politics. In J. Pennings and Associates (Eds.), Organizational strategy
and change. New York: Jossey Bass.
Pettigrew, A., Ferlie, E., and McKee, L. (1992). Shaping strategic change:
The case of the National Health System. London: Sage Publications.
Pfeffer,
J. (1981). Power in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing
Company.
Pfeffer,
J. (1983). Coalitions. In R. W. Allen and L. Porter (Eds.), Organizational
influence processes (pp. 312-320). M. E. Sharpe.
Pfeffer,
J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations.
New York: Harper Collins.
Phillips,
W. R. et al. (1997). Public dollars, common sense: New roles for financial
managers. Washington, DC: Coopers and Lybrand.
Poister,
T. H. (1992). Productivity monitoring: Systems, indicators, and analysis. In M.
Holzer (Ed.), Public productivity handbook (pp. 195-212). New York:
Marcel Dekker.
Poister,
T. H. and McGowan, R. P. (1984). The use of management tools in municipal
government: A national survey. Public Administration Review, 44(3):
215-223.
Poister,
T. H. and Streib, G. (1994). Municipal management tools from 1976 to 1993: An
overview and update. Public Productivity and Management Review, 18(2):
115-125.
Poister,
T. H. and Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government:
Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59(4):
325-335.
Portland,
Oregon, City of. Office of the City Auditor. (1995). Service efforts and
accomplishments: 1993-94. Fourth annual report on city government performance
summary. Portland, OR: Office of the City Auditor. January.
Portland,
Oregon, City of. Office of the City Auditor. (1998). City of Portland service
efforts and accomplishments: 1996-97. Portland, OR: Office of the
City Auditor. April.
Radin, B.
A. (1997). Performance-based management and its training implications. Paper
prepared for the international symposium on performance-based management and its
training implications. Caserta, Italy, September 24-26.
Radin, B.
A. (1998). The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA): Hydra-headed
monster or flexible management tool? Public Administration Review, 58(4):
307-316.
Rainey,
H. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations (2nd ed.). San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Reichardt,
C. S. (1988). Estimating effects. Unpublished manuscript. Denver, CO:
Department of Psychology, University of Denver.
Reichers,
A. E. and Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of
constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture
(pp. 5-39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rich, W.
and Winn, M. (1992). The politics of public productivity. In M. Holzer (Ed.),
Public productivity handbook (pp. 63-78). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Ridley,
C. E. and Simon, H. A. (1943). Measuring municipal activities: A survey of
suggested criteria for appraising administration. Chicago, IL: International
City Managers' Association.
Rivenbark,
W. C. and Carter, K. L. (2000). Benchmarking and cost accounting: The North
Carolina approach. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting &Financial
Management, 12(1): 125-137.
Rossi, P.
H. and Howard, E. F. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach (5th
ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Routh, M.
G. (1994). Case study: St. Pete Beach and its performance measurement system
(Perform). Public Management, 76(9): S21.
Rubin, M.
A. (1991). Sanitation collection and disposal: Service efforts and
accomplishments reporting-Its time has come. Norwalk, CT: Governmental
Accounting Standards Board.
Rubin, I. (1996). Budgeting for accountability: Municipal budgeting for the
1990s. Public Budgeting and Finance, 16(2): 112-132.
Savageau,
D. and D'Agostino, R. (2000). Places rated almanac. Foster City, CA: IDG
Books Worldwide.
Savageau, D. and Loftus, G. (1997). Places rated almanac.
New York: Macmillan.
Schultz,
G. R. (1997). Water distribution systems. In A. E. Cote and J. L. Linville
(Eds.), Fire protection handbook (18th ed., pp. 6.31-6.49). Quincy, MA:
National Fire Protection Association.
Savannah,
City of. (1996). Neighborhood quality benchmarks: 1996 report to the community.
Savannah, GA: City of Savannah.
Scainblatt, A. (1977). Monitoring the outcomes of state mental health
treatment programs: Some initial suggestions. Washington DC: The Urban
Institute.
Schein,
E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view (2nd
Ed). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Schein,
E. H. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization studies.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2): 229-240.
Schick, A. (1990). Budgeting for results: Recent developments in five
industrialized countries. Public Administration Review, 50(1): 26-34.
Schick,
A. (1992). The Road to PPB: The stages of budget reform. In A. C. Hyde (Ed.),
Government budgeting: Theory, process, politics (pp. 40-60). Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth, Inc.
Schick,
A. (1996). The spirit of reform: Managing the New Zealand state sector in a
time of change. Wellington: State Services Commission.
Schick,
A. and Hatry, H. (1982). Zero base budgeting: The manager budget. Public
Budgeting and Finance, 2(1): 72-87.
Scholtes, P. R. (1994). The team handbook. Madison,
WI: Joiner Associates Inc.
Schwabe,
C. (1996). Development and use of performance indicators in the city of Coral
Springs, Florida. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and
Performance.
Snodgrass, R. E. (Ed.). (1995). In public service: Results-oriented management
in Ontario. CA Magazine, pp. 50-54.
Southern Growth Policies Board. (1996). Results-oriented government: A guide
to strategic planning and performance measurement in the public sector.
Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.
Southern
Growth Policies Board (1997). Benchmarking best practices in the public sector. [A training
module produced by the Southern Growth Policies Board and the Southern
Consortium of University Public Service Organizations]. Research Triangle Park,
NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.
Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission. (1990). Standards
for effective local government: A workbook for performance assessment.
Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
Spendolini, M. J. (1992). The benchmarking book. New York, NY: AMACOM. A
Division of American Management Association.
Spendolim, M. J. (2000). The benchmarking book (2nd
ed.). New York: AMACOM.
State of
Minnesota Planning. (1999). Children's report card. St. Paul, MN: State
of Minnesota Planning.
Stipak, B. (1979). Citizen satisfaction with
urban services: Potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public
Administration Review, 39(1): 46.
Stokey,
E. and Zeckhauser, R. (1978). A primer for policy analysis. Boston, MA:
Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Sustainable Seattle. (1998). Indicators of sustainable community: A status
report on long-term cultural, economic, and environmental health for Seattle/King
County. Seattle, WA: Sustainable Seattle.
Swanson,
W. (1995). Measuring up against the best. Minnesota Technology (Summer).
Swindell, D. (2000). Linking citizen
satisfaction data to performance measures: A preliminary examination.
Public Performance & Management Review, 24(1):
30-52.
Swiss, J.
E. (1992). Adapting Total quality management (TQM) to government. Public
Administration Review, 52(4): 356-362.
Texas
Governors Office of Budget and Planning. (1995). Strategic planning and
budgeting in the 'New Texas': Putting service efforts and accomplishments to
Work. International Journal of Public Administration, 18(2&3): 409-441.
Texas
State Auditor Office. Accountability for Texas tomorrow: Performance based
budgeting - Improving accountability for the state. Austin, TX: Texas State
Auditor Office. (Report Number 3-119).
Texas
State Auditor Office, Legislative Budget Board and the Governor Office of Budget
and Planning. (1995). Guide to performance measurement for state agencies,
universities, and health Related institutions. Austin, TX: Author.
Thompson,
L. H. (1991). Service to the public: How effective and responsive is the
government? (Statement before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on
Ways and Means, GAO/T- HRD-91-26). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting
Office.
Thompson,
F. (1994). Mission-driven, results-oriented budgeting: Fiscal administration and
the New Public Management. Public Budgeting and Finance, 14(3): 90-105.
Tigue, P.
and Dennis, S. (1994). The use of performance measures in city and county
budgets. Chicago, IL: Government Finance Officers Association.
The
Treasury, Government of New Zealand. (1995). Purchase agreement guidelines
1996: With best practices for output performance measures. Wellington: The
Treasury, Government of New Zealand.
Torgovnik, E. and Preisler, E. (1988).
Effectiveness assessment in public service systems. Human Relations,
41(2): 103-118.
Trosa, S.
(1997). Public sector reform strategy: A giant leap or a small step? In J. Mayne
and Z. Eduardo (Eds.), In monitoring performance in the public sector: Future
directions for international experience. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
Publishers.
United
Way for the Greater New Orleans Area. (1995). Service effectiveness
assessment manual. New Orleans, LA: United Way of the Greater New Orleans
Area.
United
Way of America. (1997). Workbook from United Way of America's forum on
outcomes II. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
The
United Way Outcomes Project. (1998). Lessons learned III: Using outcome data.
Milwaukee, WI: The United Way of Greater Milwaukee.
U.S. Congressional Budget Office (1993). Using performance measures in the
federal budget process. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S.
Department of Agriculture. Data collections standards. Policy and
Standards Memo #47-95.
U.S.
Department of Education. (1999). FY 2000 annual plan. Washington, DC:
Author.
U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector General.
(1990). Technical assistance guides for conducting program evaluations and
inspections. Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector General. Office of
Evaluation and Inspections.
_____(1994). Practical Evaluation for Public Managers: Getting the
Information You Need. Washington, D.C.
U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1997). Mapping your community:
Using geographic information to strengthen community initiatives.
Washington, DC: Author.
U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. (1996). Use of performance information in
the Chesapeake Bay program. Washington, DC: American Society for Public
Administration.
U.S.
Executive Office of the President of the United States, Office of Management and
Budget. (1995). Making government work: Chapters 11, 12, and 13 from the
Budget of the United States Government for Fiscal Year 1996. Washington,
D.C.: Author.
____
(1996). Implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.
Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and independent agencies. From
Alice M. Rivlin. Washington, DC: Author. April 11.
____
(1996). Budget supplement: Reprint of Chapter 13 and Chapter 14 from the
Budget of the United States Government for Fiscal Year 1997. Washington, DC:
Author.
U.S.
Executive Office of the Vice President of the United States (1993). From red
tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less. Report
of the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: Author. September.
____
(1993). From red tape to results. Creating a government that works better and
costs less, creating quality leadership and management. Accompanying report to
the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: Author. September.
____
(1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and
costs less. Rethinking program design. Accompanying report to the National
Performance Review. Washington, DC: Author. September.
U.S.
General Accounting Office. (1988). Government auditing standards.
Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1993). Management reform: GAO's comments on the National Performance
Review's recommendations. Washington, DC: Author. December.
_____(1993). Developing and using questionnaires. Washington, DC: Author.
October.
_____(1993). Performance budgeting: State experiences and implications for
the Federal government. Report to the director of the Office of Management and
Budget. Washington, DC: Author. February.
_____(1993). Performance budgeting: State experiences and implications for
the Federal government. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
_____(1994). Government auditing standards, 1994 Revision. Washington,
DC: Author.
_____(1994). Management reform: Implementation of the National Performance
Review recommendations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
_____(1994). Managing for results: State experiences provide insights for
federal management reforms. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
_____(1995). Managing for results: The Department of Justice's initial
efforts to implement GPRA. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
_____(1995). Managing for results: State experiences provide insights for
federal management reforms. Washington, DC: Author. May.
_____(1995). The Department of Justice's initial efforts to implement GPRA.
Washington, DC: Author. June.
_____(1996). Government Performance and Results Act Performance Reports.
(GAO/GGD-96-66R). Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1996). Executive guide: Effectively implementing the Government
Performance and Results Act. Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1996). Motor vehicle safety: Comprehensive state programs offer best
opportunity for increasing use of safety belts. Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1997). Agencies' strategic plan under GPRA: Key questions to facilitate
congressional review. (GAO/GGD-10.1.16). Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1997). Business process reengineering assessment guide.
(GAO/AIMD-10.1.15) Washington, DC: Author.
_____
(1997). The Government Performance and Results Act: 1997 government-wide
implementation will be uneven. Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1998). Agencies' annual performance plans under the Results Act: An
assessment guide to facilitate congressional decision-making, Version One.
Washington, DC: Author.
_____1998). Managing for results: Agencies' annual performance plans can help
address strategic planning challenges. Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1998). Performance budgeting: Past initiatives offer insights for GPRA
implementation. Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1998). Program evaluation: Agencies challenged by new demand for
information on program results. Washington, DC: Author.
_____(1998). The Results Act: An evaluator's guide to assessing agency annual
performance plans, Version One. Washington, DC: Author.
_____
(1999). Performance budgeting: Initial agency experiences provide a
foundation to assess future directions. (GAO/T-AIMD-GGD-99-216, July 1).
Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
U.S.
National Performance Review (NPR) (1994). Putting customers first: Standards
for serving the American people. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
_____(1996). Reinvention next steps: Governing in a balanced budget world.
Speech by Vice President Al Gore and supporting background papers, 4 March.
Washington, DC: National Performance Review.
U.S.
Office of Personnel Management. (1980). Managers guide for improving
productivity. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S.
Office of Management and Budget (1996). Making government work: Budget of the
United States government. Washington, DC: Author.
Usher, C.
L. and Cornia, G. C. (1981). Goal setting and performance assessment in
municipal budgeting. Public Administration Review, 41(2): 229-235.
Utah
Legislative Research and General Counsel (1996). Utah tomorrow. Utah:
Author. February.
Van Johnston, R. (1995). Caveat emptor: Customers
vs. citizens. Public Manager, 24(3): 11-14.
Van Wert , J. M. (2002). E-government and
performance: A citizen-centered imperative. Public Manager,
31(2): 16-20.
Virginia
Department of Planning and Budget (1993). Performance measures pilot project.
VA: Author. December.
____
(1994). A strategic planning and performance measurement proposal for the
commonwealth of Virginia. VA: Author. December.
Walker, D. M. (2001). Managing by results to benefit
our Citizens. Public Manager, 30(3): 17-21.
Walker, M. (1994). Managers measure efficiency with
citizen surveys. American City & County, 109(10): 47.
Walters, J. (1994). The reality of reinvention.
Governing , 7(5): 53-60.
Walters, J. (1997). Performance and pain. Governing,
June: 26-31.
Walters,
J. (1998). Measuring up: Governing's guide to performance measurement for
geniuses and other public managers. Washington, DC: Governing Books.
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission. (1999). WSSC's proposed FY'00
budget: Performance and outcome measures. Laurel, MD: Author.
Webler, T. and Tuler, S. (2000). Fairness and
competence in citizen participation theoretical reflections from a case study.
Administration & Society, 32(5): 566-595.
Weidner,
M. and Noss-Reavely, M. (1996). The council on human investment: Performance
governance in Iowa. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for Accountability and
Performance.
White, J.
(1994). (Almost) Nothing new under the sun: Why the work of budgeting remains
incremental. Public Budgeting and Finance, 14(1): 113-134.
Wholey,
J. S. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: Urban
Institute.
Wholey,
J. S. (1983). Evaluation and effective public management. Boston: Little
Brown.
Wholey,
J. S. and Hatry, H. P. (1992). The case for performance monitoring. Public
Administration Review, 52(6): 604-610.
Wholey,
J. S., Hatry, H. P. and Newcomer, K. E. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of practical
program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wilkins,
K. (1996). Performance measurement; A work in progress. Minnesota's
Department of Labor and Industry. Washington, DC: ASPA's Center for
Accountability and Performance.
Winnie,
R., Hatry. H. P., and Wright, V. (1977). Jobs and earnings for state
citizens: Monitoring the outcomes of state economic development and employment
and training programs. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
The World
Bank, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (1998).
Public expenditure management handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank, The
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
The World
Bank Operations Policy Department. (1996). Performance monitoring indicators:
A handbook for task managers. Washington, DC: The World Bank Operations
Policy Department.
Wray, L.
(1997). Performance measurement to achieve quality of life: Adding value through
citizens. Public Management, 79(8): 4-7.
Wye, C.
G. and Hatry, H. P. (1988). (Eds.). Timely, low-cost evaluation in the
public sector. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Yates,
D., Jr. (1995). The politics of management: Exploring the inner workings of
public and private organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
