Asghar Ali Engineer
Quran is divine but its interpretation is human and hence there have been different interpretations of various Quranic verses. The differences in interpretation of the Quranic verses was not a later development but began shortly after the death of the Holy Prophet (PBUH). Different prominent companions of the Prophet began to differ from each other and with the passage of time these differences also deepened in their scope. There were various reasons for these differences. First and foremost was of course the differences due to understanding. Any text, and much more so the divine text which also tends to be symbolic, is understood depending on ones own mental and intellectual capacity. Also, the understanding of these verses depends on ones own personal or family background; the tribal background and the community ethos also would play an important role.
The Muslims were also embroiled in political disputes with the passage of time and these disputes also got reflected in interpretation of the Quranic verses. The disputing parties tried to legitimise their respective positions through either hadith or interpretation of the Quranic verses which suited their position. Also, many sects came into existence in the early period of Islam itself and every sect tried to prove its authenticity by interpreting the Quranic verses in keeping with their doctrines. The formation and doctrinal differences of these have been dealt with in various early books like Al-Farq bayn al-Firaq of Baghdadi and others. Each of these sects tried to interpret various Quranic verses in their own way. And it became impossible to resolve both political as well as doctrinal differences. There also evolved differences between the jurists (fuqaha). These jurists also interpreted the Quranic verses in keeping with their understanding of juristic issues. Thus within the Sunni Islam there developed four major schools of fiqh (jurisprudence). The same is true of hadith literature with which we will deal with in another paper.
Among other reasons for different interpretations of the Quranic verses the sectarian differences play most important and interesting role. In fact it will be no exaggeration to say that among other reasons the sectarian differences played very significant role in differing interpretation of the Quranic verses. And among other sectarian differences the differences between Sunnis and Shias assumed much more controversial role. No other two sects of Islam have differed as much as the Sunnis and Shias in understanding and interpretation of certain Quranic verses. It was on account of this that the Sunni corpus of hadith developed separately from that of Shias.
The Shias also subsequently sub-divided into number of subsects the main division being between the Ithna Asharis and Ismailis. The Ismailis developed their own independent interpretation of the Quranic verses which radically differs from not only the Sunni interpretation but also the mainstream Shia interpretation. It is the Ismaili interpretation that we would deal with in this paper. We have broadly referred to the Ismaili doctrines in one of our earlier papers. We would briefly summarise it here for ready reference of our readers.
The Ismailis branched off from the Ithna Ashari Shias on the question of succession to the fifth (and according to the Ithna Asharis the sixth) Imam Jafar al-Sadiq. It should be noted that the doctrine of imamah is very central to the Shia Islam as the doctrine of Khilafah is to the Sunni Islam. According to the Shia belief the imam must belong to the progeny of Fatima and Ali and thus son will always succeed the father. This doctrine remains central whichever the Shia sect. And most of the differences among the Shia sub-sects, though not always, have been on the question of succession as to which son succeeded the previous Imam.
The Hanafiyas believed that It was Alis son Muhammad bin Hanifa who succeeded as Imam. Similarly the Zaidi Shias believed that it was Zaid, the son of Imam Zain al-Abidin who succeeded him. The Zaidi Shias are found mostly in the Yemen. Similarly, the Ismaili Shias believe that it was Ismail who succeeded Imam Jafar al-Sadiq whereas the Ithna Asharis believe that it was Musa Kazim who became imam after Imam Jafar al-Sadiq. The chain of imamah as far as the Ithna Asharis are concerned stopped with the seclusion of the 12th imam whose reappearance is awaited by them. And as far as the Ismailis are concerned the office of imama continued in the progeny of Ismail and the 21st imam Taiyyib went into seclusion. But unlike the Ithna Asharis the Ismailis do not believe that 21st imam will reappear; they, on the other hand, believe that the imama continues in his progeny and that the imam of the time from his progeny will appear one day. It is also to be noted that the Ismailis also split on the question of succession of imama after Imam Mustansir billah. A section of the Ismailis believed that Mustansir had nominated his younger son Mustali as his successor and the other section believed that Nizar, his elder son, was nominated as Mustansirs successor. And Imam Taiyyib belongs to the Mustalian stream.
Here in this paper we will be dealing mainly with the interpretation of the Quran by the Ismailis before the split between the Mustalians and the Nizaris. The Druzes are also basically Ismailis and we will deal with Druzes in a separate paper. The Druzes split off from the Ismailis after the death of Imam Hakim. The Druzes developed their own interpretation of the Quran which again radically differs from the mainstream Ismailis.
The Ismailis, like all other Shias believe in the hidden meaning of the Quran which they refer to as tawil. In the tafsir literature of Sunni Islam the words tafsir and tawil are used almost synonymously. But in the Shia Islam both have distinct meaning. Tafsir in Shia Islam refers to the manifest meaning of the Quran and tawil refers to its hidden meaning. The Sunnis and Shias differ on the meaning of the sixth verse of the chapter three i.e. the chapter on Ali Imran. According to the Sunni commentators this verse means that None knows its interpretation (tawil i.e. the hidden meaning) save Allah and the rasikhun fi alilm (i.e. those firmly rooted in knowledge) say: We believe in it, it is all from our Lord. Thus according to the Sunni commentators of the Quran Allah alone has the knowledge of tawil and the Rasikhun fi al-ilm (i.e. the great Ulama) do not possess that knowledge and they only believe that it is known only to Allah.
The Shiahs, on the other hand, believe that the knowledge of tawil is possessed by the al-rasikhun fi al-ilm also and these rasikhun in ilm are nothing but the imams from the progeny of Fatima and Ali. Not only Allah but the holy Prophet (PBUH), his legatee (wasi) and imams from his progeny also possess the knowledge of tawil. Now the most important question is what is this tawil?. In the Ismaili literature it is also referred to as ilm al-ladunni which passes orally from Prophet to his wasi and from wasi to imam and from one imam to another.
But if we go historically then one finds the exposition of tawil literature much later i.e. during the Abbasid period, in fact, after the controversy about the appointment of Ismail and the subsequent split in the Shia community. The hidden meaning of the Quranic verses is attempted by the Ismaili imams and dais (i.e. missionaries and summoners to the Ismaili faith) after the spread of Greek knowledge in the Islamic world. We have already written about The Rasail Ikhwanus Safa i.e. the Epistles of the Brethren of Purity in a separate paper. These epistles are of great importance in the Ismaili literature. These epistles though do not attempt exposition of tawil systematically but do contain elements of it and could be taken as the beginning of the exposition of the discipline of tawil. Its fifty-third epistle supposedly deals with this.
The Ismaili dais particularly Saiyyidna Yaqub al-Sijistani, Saiyyidna Jafar Mansur al-Yaman, Saiyyidna Qadi al-Numan, Saiyyidna Hamiduddin Kirmani, Saiyyidna Muayyad Shirazi, Saiyyidna Hatim and several others have played great role in developing this unique discipline. It will be no exaggeration to say that ilm al-tawil is really unique to the Ismaili sect and it was a grand attempt to synthesise the all available knowledge of the time - particularly the Greek knowledge popularised by the Abbasids through translations of the Greek classics into Arabic - with the Islamic teachings.
Of course the Ismailis believe that the ilm of tawil did not develop with the popularisation of the Greek knowledge but is part of the ilm al-nubuwwat (i.e. the Prophetic knowledge) passed on from imam to imam as referred to earlier. But historically speaking we do not find its record before the Epistles of Ikhwanus Safa were compiled. One can say that this knowledge of tawil among the Ismailis was reduced to writing only when faced with the challenge of the Greek knowledge. Asharis among the Sunnis met this challenge by totally opposing the Greek philosophy (though using its tools to refute it) while the Ismailis among the Shias met this challenge by attempting a creative synthesis of the Greek knowledge including its cosmogony with the basic teachings of Islam. Thus the Asharis and the Ismailis carved out different ways of meeting the challenge of the Greek philosophy and its great impact on the Islamic world. This impact should not be underrated.
The Ismaiili tawil is based on reason. The word tawil in Arabic means to go to the first, primary or basic meaning of the word. According to the Ismailis each and every verse of the Quran has basic meaning or hidden meaning apart from the manifest or secondary meaning. According to them a mumin is one who knows and believes in the hidden or original meaning (batin) of the Quranic verses. The Ismailis maintain that there is difference between a Muslim and a Mumin. One who recites the kalima and performs all the manifest rituals (zahiri) like offering prayers, fasting, giving zakat, performing haj etc. is a Muslim. But a mumin is more than being a Muslim. A Mumin is one who not only performs the zahiri rituals but also believes in batin, the real, the original, the intended, meaning of these rituals.
The Ismailis quote the verse 14 of the chapter 49 which reads as follows: The dwellers of the desert say: We believe (amanna). Say: You believe not, but say, We submit (aslamna); and faith (iman) has not yet entered into your hearts. Thus this verse, the Ismaili theologians point out, clearly makes distinction between Islam and Iman, between those who submit (Muslims) and those who believe Mumin. Iman, according to them is not mere acceptance of what is manifest zahir but sincere belief in batin (the hidden, the original).
Before we proceed further it is necessary to throw light on what is batin or what is the way tawil is done? It is also important to note that ordinary people are not supposed to know the original meaning or the tawil. It is only the chosen few or the initiated who are entitled to know. The contents of tawil was kept a strictly guided secret even from ordinary believers. The reason was obvious. The Ismailis were looked upon as heretics by the orthodox Muslims. Imam Ghazali also wrote a book on Batinis and condemned them. They were accused of believing in hulul and tanasukh i.e. belief in Imam being God and transmigration of souls though it is not true. Even Dr. Kamil Husain, who was chairman of the department of Ismaili Studies, Al-Azhar, Cairo, strongly refuted such allegations. But the Ismailis were greatly misunderstood about their real beliefs.
The Ismailis, for fear of such condemnations had to hide from general Muslims their beliefs in batini theology and reveal it only to the chosen or initiated few. The knowledge of batin was revealed to a person only after ensuring his/her sincerity and faithfulness. Even today the ordinary Bohras do not have any knowledge of tawil though there is no such fear as it prevailed in those days from the Sunni orthodox ulama.
According to the Ismailis there is whole ideal system called mathal and here on earth there is a corresponding system called mamthul (representative of the ideal). To understand this it is necessary to know that Allah is a totally transcendent Being who cannot be comprehended by human mind at all. He transcends everything conceivable and is just incomprehensible. He has no attributes whatsoever. He is also not actively involved in creation of the universe. He only created the uqul (intellects made of pure light). The intellects are fine beings made of light. The matter, as opposed to light, is kathif (i.e. heavy and dark) Allah or the Ultimate Being has no role in creation of matter. He is referred to by Saiyyidna Yaqub al-Sijistani as Mubdi al-Mubdiat (i.e. the Creator of the creators. His role ceased with creation of the Uqul (i.e. the Intellects). Allah created only light, not darkness. One cannot attribute creation of darkness and kathafat (heaviness) to Him.
Matter was created by the tenth Intellect also called ashir-i-mudabbir (i.e. the Tenth Intellect managing the universe). All the matter representing kathafat (heaviness and darkness). Since the Tenth Intellect (Ashir-e-Mudabbir) is responsible for creation of matter and this universe it is his responsibility to reconvert this darkness and heaviness into light (nur). The corresponding being on earth to the Tenth Intellect is the Prophet. Thus the Prophet is the mamthul of Ashir-e-Mudabbir on earth. He assists him (i.e. the Tenth Intellect) in transforming the kathafat (darkness and heaviness) into latafat (nur).
The Prophet shows the right path to the people and has been described by the Quran as sirajan munirah (i.e. the lighted lamp) for this reason. He transforms the human beings into light (nur). After the Prophet it is the Imam who performs this function. And as there cannot be any Prophet after Muhammad (PBUH), he is succeeded by Imams from the progeny of Fatima, his daughter and Ali, her husband. According to the Ismaili beliefs this earth can never remain without Imam, a spiritual guide, an active agent (mamthul of Ashir-e-Mudabbir) on earth. An Ismaili dai wrote an epistle Ithbat-ul-Imamah to prove this.
Thus Imam on earth is the representative of the Tenth Intellect and hence commands highest respect of the believers. He has all the attributes of the Tenth Intellect and since Allah has no attributes (He transcends all attributes and is beyond them), these attributes apply to the Tenth Intellect. Therefore Imam who is mamthul of the Tenth Intellect on earth also has these attributes on earth. It is this theory of attributes which was misunderstood by the opponents of the Fatimi Imams as the belief in hulul i.e. descent of God into the person of Imam. Dr.Kamil Husain has discussed this in detail in his Muqaddimah (introduction) to the Diwan of Saiyyidna Muayyad Shirazi. The person of Imam does not correspond to Allah but to the Tenth Intellect, as pointed out above.
The Ismailis (also referred to as the Fatimids or those following the Fatimi Dawah) also believe in the cyclical theory of history. Since it is the duty of the Tenth Intellect to covert total darkness and kathafat in the universe into light in every cycle of history a portion of darkness is reconverted into light and these cycles will continue until entire matter is reconverted into mur (light) and there is no more kathafat in this universe.
In every cycle an Adam is created and the chain of prophethood ends with the last Prophet who is in turn succeeded by imams and lastly, in every cycle there appears what is known as Qaim al-qiyamah (i.e. one who brings about the Day of Judgement, the Qiyamat). The cycle ends with the Qaim al-Qiyamah and a definite portion of dark matter is converted into light in that cycle. Thus, according to this theory, these cycles will continue until there is no more matter in this universe and all matter there in is transformed into latafat i.e. light and it is light which will ultimately prevail. This, in short, is the Ismaili cyclical theory of history of this universe.
Some of the important books of tawil and batini ulum are the Kitab al-Shawahid wa al-Bayan of Saiyyidna Mansur al-Yaman, Tawil al-Daaim of Saiyyidna Qadi al-Numan Rahat al-Aql by Saiyyidna Hamiduddin Kirmani, Al-Majalis of Saiyyidna Muayyad Shirazi etc. These books contain the highest achievements of the Ismaili or Fatimi missionaries as far as the knowledge of batin is concerned. We will give some examples of ilm al-tawil from these books.
Saiyyidna Qadi al-Numan who compiled the celebrated book of Ismaili jurisprudence Al-Daaim al-Islam, also compiled Tawil al-Daaim. In this latter work Qadi Numan describes the original meanings of all the elements of shariah and all the related rituals. Qadi Numan first emphasises that a true believer has to strike balance between the zahir and batin i.e. what is manifest and what is original intent of the shariah rituals. Qadi Numan had to lay this emphasis on the balance between zahir and batin because some extremists among the Ismailis had declared that the shariah is suspended (tatil al-shariah) and it is no more necessary to observe the external rituals for those who know ilm al-batin. The Qaramitah, an extremist sect of the Ismailis had ceased to observe the zahiri shariah. The Nizaris later did the same thing.
The Ismailis, as pointed out in an earlier paper, believe in seven pillars of Islam as opposed to other Muslims who believe in five pillars. The two additional pillars are walayah (the love of the family of the Prophet - ahl al-bayt) and taharah (cleanliness). Taharah really means spiritual cleanliness and removal of all spiritual pollutants. The Qadi describes in his Tawil al-Daaim the hidden meaning of all the seven daaim, (pillars) one by one.
The very first pillar according to the Ismailis is walayat (love of the family of the Prophet). According to the Qadi each pillar represents one of the great prophets from Adam to Muhammad. Adam represents walayah. Adam was the first prophet whose walayah was made obligatory on the angels and the angels were made to prostrate before him or perform sajdah before him. Sajdah in reality implies obedience. And this is walayah. Adam is the first of all the prophets and his walayah is the walayah of all the succeeding prophets and imams. Those who do not have love of Adam cannot achieve salvation.
The second pillar, according to the Ismaili theology, is taharah (i.e. purity). The second prophet Nuh (Noah) represents taharah. Nuh was sent for purification of mankind. Whatever sins were committed during and after Admas time Nuh came to purify them and he is one of the great prophets, a prophet with his own shariah. The flood water which is associated with Nuh, symbolises purity as water is needed for purity from dirt and water in batin means ilm (knowledge of ultimate reality) and it is through knowledge that spiritual purity can be attained.
And the third pillar is Salah (i.e. prayer) and Qadi Numan ascribes it to the Prophet Ibrahim. It is he who constructed Baytullah i.e. the House of Allah in Mecca and Allah made this House the Qiblah (i.e. the direction in which the Muslims turn to pray). Hazrat Ibrahim also has great status among the prophets and he is also described as hanif in the holy Quran i.e. one who is inclined towards truth.
And it is the prophet Musa who represents zakat. He is the first prophet who is said to have asked Pharaoh (Firaun) to purify himself (tazakka (see the verse 79:16). Musa was the first prophet whom Allah called upon to preach to Firaun purity of self (tazkiyah). Zakat has essentially to do with purification. It is through zakat that one purifies ones wealth by giving away one portion of it to the needy and poor.
The saum (fasting) is related to the prophet Isa (Christ). Saum in tawil actually means keeping silent about the batin (i.e. hidden truth of the injunctions of shariah). It was Isas mother Mariyam (Mary) who was asked by Allah to say to her people that I have vowed a fast to the Beneficient, so I will not speak to any man today. (19:26). Thus it will be seen that in this verse fasting is directly related to keeping silent (about the knowledge of batin)
Similarly haj is related to the last of the prophets Muhammad (PBUH). It is he who first required Muslims to perform haj and expounded all its related manasik (i.e. rituals pertaining to haj). Though the Arabs used to perform haj before Islam but the manasik appointed by Allah in the Quran did not exist. Allah says about the pre-Islamic Arabs and their prayer near the Kabah And their prayer at the House is nothing but whistling and clapping of hands. (8:35). And the disbelievers used to circumambulate around Kabah in a state of nakedness. It is the holy Prophet who abolished such abominable practice. They had also installed idols all around Kabah whom they used to worship. It is Prophet Muhammad who demolished these idols. He then appointed the rituals for the haj.
And the last of the pillars of Islam is jihad and it is related to the seventh of the chain of imams. The Ismailis (or the Fatimids) give great importance to every seventh imam in the chain of Fatimi imams. The seventh imam is also called natiq (i.e. Speaker). Thus every seventh imam will speak with the permission of Allah about His injunctions and give them a new interpretation through his exertions or through waging war to purify His religion. The Qaim al-Qiyamah, referred to above, will also be the seventh of the chain of imams and he will be the last of the seventh imams and through him the ummah will be unified on the shariah of the Prophet Muhammad. Thus Prophet Muhammad has merit over all other prophets in the sense that two pillars of Islam - haj and jihad - have been related to him and his progeny.
Saiyyidna Qadi Al-Numan in his Tawil al-Daaim lays great stress on ilm (knowledge). Ilm is very fundamental to the Ismaili system. Ilm is wazir (minister) to iman (faith). Faith draws sustenance through ilm (knowledge). The Qadi says that ilm applies to both zahir (manifest) and batin (hidden). Thus a mumin becomes true person of faith through iman and ilm. As the human body can be purified only by water, the soul of a mumin can be purified only by knowledge. And as amwal (material wealth) cannot be given to undeserving persons or those weak of understanding (sufaha see verse 4:5), knowledge also cannot be imparted to those who do not deserve.
Thus one who has been favoured by Allah through knowledge, he should not impart it to undeserving persons. In other words the knowledge of batin can be imparted only to deserving persons whose iman (faith) is strong and unwavering and it will become even more stronger through such knowledge. But if it is imparted to undeserving person, his faith may be weakened and his doubts might increase. Also, one should not be miserly in imparting knowledge of tawil to deserving people and he should not be extravagant with the undeserving.
Prayer system (salah) in its essence means establishing the system of dawah. Wherever the Quran speaks of salah it does not say read prayer but says establish prayer (aqim al-salah) which in fact means establish the dawah headed by the imam who is, after the Prophet, the highest representative of the community of the faithfuls. As one is required to come to prayers at appropriate time, one is required to devote ones energy is establishing the dawah (mission) at suitable times and make all possible efforts for it. As the soul enriches itself through prayers, a faithful enriches one self by his/her efforts to establish the mission for the faithfuls.
In short these are some of the prominent features of the Ismaili tawil. In this brief essay we cannot do full justice to it. But an attempt has been made here to throw light on its essential features. The Fatimi Dais have written hundreds of books on this subject which are available to the scholars. This essay can only initiate those interested into the subject.